Originally Posted by Couch-Potato:
Going to come up with a clever scoring system for us this week, the challenge turned out to be more difficult than expected.
Originally Posted by Couch-Potato:
Going to come up with a clever scoring system for us this week, the challenge turned out to be more difficult than expected.
Just keep it simple ... most picks that ended up on the team then tiebreaker by round hit or something. Don't get too extravagant its just for giggly shits anyhow. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Rain Man:
I propose that next year we pick ...
3 players for the first round
4 players for the second round
5 players for the third round
and so on up to 10 players for the seventh round. It's really difficult to hit a seventh-round pick given all of the options.
I was thinking along the same lines but having it add a pick each round so 1 selection in the 1st, 2 in the 2nd, 3 in the 3rd, etc. Almost a "call your shot" exercise though at that point. [Reply]
1) Later rounds are worth more bc of greater difficulty
2) Picking the right player in the wrong round is worth 1/2 points if 1 round apart, 1/4 if 2 rounds or greater [Reply]
I think I should get credit for basically getting the position correct in the first two round. But only me, no one else gets bonus points for that.
I also think I deserve full credit for the Jared Wiley pick given that we traded away the 3rd that I slotted him in at. Again, only I should get credit for this one.
That all seems fair! And I think that effectively makes me the winner! [Reply]