Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
She pushed out 4 of his kids and was there from the beginning.
She deserves 1/2 of everything.
Why does her having kids have anything to do with Amazon and the company he built?
Hopefully someday these outdated marriage laws will cease to exist. In the old days, the male was the breadwinner and the female was not expected to work so it makes A LITTLE sense that the wife would get half. Times have changed. We are all equals. She has equal opportunity to make whatever money she can on her own, as a novelist. Which is apparently what she does for a living. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Why does her having kids have anything to do with Amazon and the company he built?
Hopefully someday these outdated marriage laws will cease to exist. In the old days, the male was the breadwinner and the female was not expected to work so it makes A LITTLE sense that the wife would get half. Times have changed. We are all equals. She has equal opportunity to make whatever money she can on her own, as a novelist. Which is apparently what she does for a living.
I think you're conflating two issues.
The splitting of assets for a family who grew a business together is not outdated.
I do agree that in general, a lot of divorce proceedings favor the woman unfairly, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. She wasn't a gold digger. She was with him for 25 years, well before he was a blip on anyone's radar. They had 4 kids together.
Plus, wasn't he the one cheating on her? But I can't find a source other than tabloids, and it seems like they've been separated for a long time too, so maybe it was during that period and not a big deal. [Reply]
