- Ranked 2nd among charted prospects in success rate vs. man (75%) and press coverage (75.7%) - Led all prospects in success rate vs. zone coverage (88.1%) - He can play inside and outsidehttps://t.co/HbifB61JlJpic.twitter.com/HYsV8rlAzF
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
Skyy was ranked the best run-blocking WR on the team last season. Kid throws a good block.
Wanna know why PFF is just silly?
Moore's RBLK Grade on the season: 63.8 -- when broken down by gap/zone? 60.9 in Zone, 56.6 in Gap.
MVS RBLK grade last season: 42.1 -- When broken down gap/zone? 73.0 in Zone, 62.4 in Gap.
PFF gives him better grades for both types of runs - by a LOT. And gives him a worse overall RBLK score - again by a lot.
That makes precisely zero sense whatsoever.
PFF makes these grades up as they go. They're complete bullshit. Guy averages 12 points 'higher' per category and 20 points LOWER on aggregate. I'm not a mathematician but I know that ain't how maths work. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
Wanna know why PFF is just silly?
Moore's RBLK Grade on the season: 63.8 -- when broken down by gap/zone? 60.9 in Zone, 56.6 in Gap.
MVS RBLK grade last season: 42.1 -- When broken down gap/zone? 73.0 in Zone, 62.4 in Gap.
PFF gives him better grades for both types of runs - by a LOT. And gives him a worse overall RBLK score - again by a lot.
That makes precisely zero sense whatsoever.
PFF makes these grades up as they go. They're complete bullshit. Guy averages 12 points 'higher' per category and 20 points LOWER on aggregate. I'm not a mathematician but I know that ain't how maths work.
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
I'd rather have a WR who can get open but can't block for shit.
Originally Posted by New World Order:
So put Prince Wituango, our swing tackle out there then
Lol, not arguing with you guys. I’d rather Skyy be an above average pass catcher as well. And fwiw, it wasnt just PFF that rated him as the teams best run-blocker. At the end of the day, he is good at it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Squishy Snatch: :-) We've found the Frank Clark is good in coverage equivalent for Moore, eh?
I'd say it's more 'sets the edge'.
It's really just something he does at a passable level that we're now elevating to something he does extremely well (and putting it on equal footing to the thing we actually acquired him to do...). Like Clark setting the edge, Moore does that job adequately. And like Clark rushing the passer, Moore can't do his primary purpose for shit.
If this were Frank Clark is Good in Coverage it would essentially be like "Well Moore is amazing on jet sweeps..." or something. Some ancillary gimmick that we built up to great importance. [Reply]
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho:
Yeah, I was hopeful we'd see him take a step this year, but it doesn't look to be happening.
He's much more of a bust than Mecole Hardman at this point in his career.
He's on pace for 30 catches and 476 yds. I'd say he's the equal bust to Hardman. Now if continues to go half of the games with goose eggs that will be a different conversation. [Reply]