The Chiefs received permission to talk with DeAndre Hopkins earlier in the offseason and spoke to him before the draft, per sources. Contract was the hurdle, and to do it now, price would have to come way down.
KC likes him, but the deal they gave Donovan Smith makes $$$ tough.
Originally Posted by Chief Roundup:
LT is more important than WR. Mahomes health is the most important thing!
An old LT on a one year prove it rental deal because he was dog crap playing hurt the previous season isn’t what I’d call an investment in our QB’s health when the long term plan at LT was currently on the roster [Reply]
Originally Posted by RealSNR:
An old LT on a one year prove it rental deal because he was dog crap playing hurt the previous season isn’t what I’d call an investment in our QB’s health when the long term plan at LT was currently on the roster
I DONT DISAGREE BUT I DO NEED TO ADD TO THE POST COUNT LIKE MAHOMES BODY COUNT STONE COLD KILLER [Reply]
Originally Posted by RealSNR:
An old LT on a one year prove it rental deal because he was dog crap playing hurt the previous season isn’t what I’d call an investment in our QB’s health when the long term plan at LT was currently on the roster
Pretty obvious that Taylor was not the Chiefs long term solution at LT. That was also obvious with them wanting to trade up for a LT. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RealSNR:
An old LT on a one year prove it rental deal because he was dog crap playing hurt the previous season isn’t what I’d call an investment in our QB’s health when the long term plan at LT was currently on the roster
Originally Posted by Chief Roundup:
Pretty obvious that Taylor was not the Chiefs long term solution at LT. That was also obvious with them wanting to trade up for a LT.
If he wasn't, then the Chiefs waaaaaaaay over paid. He got paid way more than Orlando did. [Reply]
Over the past three seasons, DeAndre Hopkins has dropped only three passes on 315 targets, the lowest drop rate (1.0%) among 62 wide receivers who have been targeted at least 175 times during that span. [Reply]