Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy:
Who cares? He is a kid. People make mistakes. Girl was being a bitch. No way in hell should he have been released. Chiefs clearly made a mistake, only an idiot would think otherwise.
Come on man... Get the story straight. The media was wrong on Tyreek and never corrected the facts. You are wrong here. You should take time to know the story on the Kareem situation, you may feel differently. The girl wasn't bring a "bitch"... Hunt told her to **** his friend, she refused, they kicked her out of the room, but they HAD HER PHONE... She had no way of calling for a ride and obviously, most people, wouldn't leave without their phone anyway. If he would have just given back her phone, he wouldn't have been in that situation. However, based on his activities at the time, it wouldn't have been long before he screwed up again. Can you imagine the last 5 games last year with Hunt on the team and the distraction and the Hill 2014 situation brought back up endlessly... No way we make the AFCCG if Hunt isn't cut. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
They were punished. They have to go 8 games without him. Why should they lose a draft pick?
That's not much punishment at all. They did not need him on their roster and now they get him down the end stretch of the season with completely fresh legs. [Reply]
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy:
Who cares? He is a kid. People make mistakes. Girl was being a bitch. No way in hell should he have been released. Chiefs clearly made a mistake, only an idiot would think otherwise.
Doesn't matter as has been said 1000s of time here and elsewhere it was the lie not the incident. He swore to Clark and Andy that he wasn't there. Then the video came out and he was there. He lied to the organization and the team owner. That left the organization and the NFL to investigate and get on top of it. The lying not the incident sealed his fate with the Chiefs. [Reply]
Originally Posted by srvy:
Doesn't matter as has been said 1000s of time here and elsewhere it was the lie not the incident. He swore to Clark and Andy that he wasn't there. Then the video came out and he was there. He lied to the organization and the team owner. That left the organization and the NFL to investigate and get on top of it. The lying not the incident sealed his fate with the Chiefs.
Meh, it’s still not really that. Pat could fuck Clark’s wife and daughter on the 50 and swear he never did it, and the Chiefs would keep him. It’s more that the organization viewed him as replaceable. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DRM08:
That's not much punishment at all. They did not need him on their roster and now they get him down the end stretch of the season with completely fresh legs.
Why should they be punished for being smart/actually good at their jobs? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
Meh, it’s still not really that. Pat could fuck Clark’s wife and daughter on the 50 and swear he never did it, and the Chiefs would keep him. It’s more that the organization viewed him as replaceable.
Originally Posted by DRM08:
That's not much punishment at all. They did not need him on their roster and now they get him down the end stretch of the season with completely fresh legs.
Would you have used that same argument if Hill got suspended? That he would be fresh at the end of the season?
And again why did the browns have to be punished? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
Meh, it’s still not really that. Pat could fuck Clark’s wife and daughter on the 50 and swear he never did it, and the Chiefs would keep him. It’s more that the organization viewed him as replaceable.
A running back in a fully stacked West coast offense with the league MVP at quarterback?
Of course they viewed him as replaceable and rightly so. [Reply]