Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation.
“I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.
Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”
“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.
Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago.
“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.
Originally Posted by jd1020:
The USSC has tens of thousands of case applications a year and hears less than a hundred. Better have an awfully good case that might actually change the results of the election instead of something the might just invalidate 10k votes in PA that arrived in the 3 days following election day.
At best you have to hope for is changes to the election process for next time around.
Yeah, sure, they will hear the case that you can be sure! There was massive fraud, and you know it! You dumbass libby's got sloppy!!! Fraud everywhere!!!! [Reply]
Originally Posted by Shields68:
There was no evidence of illegal collusion with Russia by the campaign. Yet it happened.
There was, actually. The Trump Tower meeting. Mueller just decided to not prosecute because he didn't believe that the government would be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the meeting participants had general knowledge that their conduct was unlawful. [Reply]
Originally Posted by tyreekthefreak:
Yeah, sure, they will hear the case that you can be sure! There was massive fraud, and you know it! You dumbass libby's got sloppy!!! Fraud everywhere!!!!
Originally Posted by Donger:
There was, actually. The Trump Tower meeting. Mueller just decided to not prosecute because he didn't believe that the government would be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the meeting participants had general knowledge that their conduct was unlawful.
LOL It was not unlawful. Meeting with someone is not unlawful. Exchanging information, even though nothing was exchanged, is not unlawful. Team Mueller was and is full of partisan bs. The FBI knew what happened in that meeting, right after it happened and knew it was not illegal. [Reply]
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
Nothing from 2016 is relevant to the subject at hand, if you're thinking logically. If you let your feels take over, then maybe you whine about something that happened 4 years ago.
I'll be sure to remind you of that next time you're whining about racism and invoking the Klan.
Originally Posted by Shields68:
LOL It was not unlawful. Meeting with someone is not unlawful. Exchanging information, even though nothing was exchanged is not unlawful. Team Mueller was and is full of partisan bs.
Actually, it is illegal for campaigns to accept help from a foreign government or from foreign nationals:
"The investigation has not developed evidence that the participants in the meeting were familiar with the foreign-contribution ban or the application of federal law to the relevant factual context. The government does not have strong evidence of surreptitious behavior or efforts at concealment at the time of the June 9 meeting." [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pants:
There's no way that's true.
NEW: Monica Palmer, Wayne Co. (MI) Board of Canvassers' chairperson, a Republican, tells me Trump called her & another GOP canvas member, William Hartmann, on Tuesday pm. On Wednesday, Palmer & Hartmann signed affidavits saying they regret their votes to certify the election.
Originally Posted by Donger:
There was, actually. The Trump Tower meeting. Mueller just decided to not prosecute because he didn't believe that the government would be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the meeting participants had general knowledge that their conduct was unlawful.
The FBI is an investigative body, not a prosecutorial one.
Nothing was exchanged in the Trump tower meeting. Nothing illegal or unlawful happened.
Originally Posted by Donger:
Actually, it is illegal for campaigns to accept help from a foreign government or from foreign nationals:
"The investigation has not developed evidence that the participants in the meeting were familiar with the foreign-contribution ban or the application of federal law to the relevant factual context. The government does not have strong evidence of surreptitious behavior or efforts at concealment at the time of the June 9 meeting."
Oh yeah, tell that to the Clinton campaign with fusion GPS and Christopher Steele.
Originally Posted by Donger: Actually, it is illegal for campaigns to accept help from a foreign government or from foreign nationals:
"The investigation has not developed evidence that the participants in the meeting were familiar with the foreign-contribution ban or the application of federal law to the relevant factual context. The government does not have strong evidence of surreptitious behavior or efforts at concealment at the time of the June 9 meeting."
Totally false. Campaigns meet with foreigners all the time. They did not receive money or campaign contributions. Getting oppo research or information has never been shown to have broke campaign finance laws.
Hillary did actually get information from foreigners and use it. (Either Steele who is a foreign national or Russians who allegedly gave Steele the information).
The Democrats have had illegals speak at their convention. They enlisted them to help get out the vote. [Reply]
NEW: Monica Palmer, Wayne Co. (MI) Board of Canvassers' chairperson, a Republican, tells me Trump called her & another GOP canvas member, William Hartmann, on Tuesday pm. On Wednesday, Palmer & Hartmann signed affidavits saying they regret their votes to certify the election.