Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation.
“I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.
Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”
“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.
Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago.
“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.
Trumps team has to take their time so their cases will make it to the US Supreme Court.......where they will more than likely prevail due to the 6-3 advantage!!!!! lolololol [Reply]
Originally Posted by Donger:
What does that even mean?
They are basically saying only 71% of their ballots are eligible for recount. It's up from 50% in August when they certified. Their argument that they should certify is that it went from an absolutely terrible 50% to a less but still absolutely terrible 71%. This has been a problem in the county for a long time. They are running a banana republic in that county. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Donger:
The investigations into Trump campaign coordination with Russians had nothing to do with challenging the veracity of the election.
Hahahaha you've outdone yourself old chap, a new personal best.
Has Hillary conceded the 2016 election yet? Wasn't she the one that told Biden to not concede under any circumstances?
Oh yeah that's right, you believe it all stemmed from a Trump campaign member running his mouth at a party :-).
Originally Posted by tyreekthefreak:
Trumps team has to take their time so their cases will make it to the US Supreme Court.......where they will more than likely prevail due to the 6-3 advantage!!!!! lolololol
The USSC has tens of thousands of case applications a year and hears less than a hundred. Better have an awfully good case that might actually change the results of the election instead of something the might just invalidate 10k votes in PA that arrived in the 3 days following election day.
At best you have to hope for is changes to the election process for next time around. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk:
I'm so excite! Is Georgia going to get overturned like the female lady says!>/?
Nothing is going to get overturned if it is strictly a recount going on. There might have been a few hundred ballots actually miscounted, but that's it. And that's true for every state in question.
The only chance anything gets overturned is if they can find fraud of some form where ballots can be thrown out of the equation entirely. And I have no faith in that happening besides probably a few dozen here and there.
I know you are just trolling, but I thought I'd use your post to state my beliefs here. [Reply]
The media basically showed everyone how to hack and manipulate voting machines and now no one wants to believe it happened or even can happen. Even if the current election results do not get overturned I sincerely hope the voting machines are heavily scrutinized and fixed going forward. [Reply]
Originally Posted by True North:
Previous allegations of election fraud are completely relevant to the subject at hand. Might be time for you to find a new hobby.
Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk
Nothing from 2016 is relevant to the subject at hand, if you're thinking logically. If you let your feels take over, then maybe you whine about something that happened 4 years ago. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Donger:
Do you think that CH or Mueller would have happened without the actions of the Trump campaign?
There was no evidence of illegal collusion with Russia by the campaign. Yet it happened. By the time Mueller happened the FBI clearly knew that there was no big there there. [Reply]
