Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation.
“I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.
Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”
“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.
Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago.
“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.
Originally Posted by Donger:
The investigations into Trump campaign coordination with Russians had nothing to do with challenging the veracity of the election.
Originally Posted by :
You can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you," she said to cheers...
Originally Posted by Donger:
The investigations into Trump campaign coordination with Russians had nothing to do with challenging the veracity of the election.
The Democrat talking point was that all of the investigation were needed to safe guard our elections. Surely direct evidence of fraud would fit into the same rational.
But really what do you believe would have happened if it was determined that Trump coordinated with Russia during the election?
I would venture to guess the Democrats would have moved to overturn the election. It was an attempt to find evidence to overturn the results. It may not have worked. But the majority of Democrats believed the election was stolen from Hillary and a large % actually believed results were changed. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk:
Someone please answer; how many states have been overturned?!
*Checks the Trump campaign debt total*
... tune in Tuesday next week where the evidence will be revealed of widespread voter fraud! In the mean time, if you feel obligated to expose the corrupt acts of the Democrats and their treasonous attempt to steal the election, please donate to the Donald Trump Keep America Great fund! [Reply]
Originally Posted by Shields68:
The Democrat talking point was that all of the investigation were needed to safe guard our elections. Surely direct evidence of fraud would fit into the same rational.
But really what do you believe would have happened if it was determined that Trump coordinated with Russia during the election?
I would venture to guess the Democrats would have moved to overturn the election. It was an attempt to find evidence to overturn the results. It may not have worked.
I doubt that they said that in response to Crossfire Hurricane or the Mueller investigation. [Reply]
Susan Voyles, a Georgia poll worker with 20 years of experience, said in a sworn affidavit Tuesday that she noticed something strange about a batch of ballots that overwhelmingly favored Joe Biden, leading her to believe “additional absentee ballots had been added in a fraudulent manner.”
The observation came when she was serving as an auditor in the recount at the Fulton County Sandy Springs poll station.
“For our first assignment, we were given a cardboard box that contained only absentee ballots,” she wrote. “It was taped shut with packing tape with the seal of the Secretary of State. But the seal was blank, signed by no one, and no information had been supplied. There were no markings indicating the provenance of the box. The box was marked as Box No. 5—Absentee—Batch Numbers 28-36.”
Within that box were stacks of ballots, with roughly 100 in each stack.
“Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious use. However, one batch stood out. It was pristine,” she continued. “There was a difference in the texture of the paper—it was if they were intended for absentee use but had not been used for that purposes. There was a difference in the feel.”
The ballots also showed no markings to indicate where they came from or were processed. “These stood out,” she said.
With 20 years of handling ballots behind her, Voyles “observed that the markings for the candidates in these ballots were unusually uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device.”
According to her estimate, 98 percent were for Joe Biden. “I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President Donald J. Trump.”
Originally Posted by Donger:
I doubt that they said that in response to Crossfire Hurricane or the Mueller investigation.
But that is why the agents have attempted to justify their actions. I mean what were they looking at if it was not campaign coordination with Russia? [Reply]
Originally Posted by stevieray:
thanks cap'n obvious.
maybe you can ask multiple times a day.
oh wait.
it's amazing how many of you are so emotionally invested.
Who is more emotionally involved? The people asking for the evidence or the people clinging to hope that evidence is ACTUALLY revealed... for once... this next time... its coming... soon... 100% on Thursday... maybe next week... hopefully before Jan 20th. [Reply]
