Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation.
“I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.
Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”
“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.
Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago.
“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.
Originally Posted by GloryDayz:
To be fair, what lesser shocking thing could those beasts do to get somebody to hear their message? It's not like they're ever going to be given a chance to be heard in a visual format otherwise; Christiane Amanpour and Rachel Madcow have the "ugly bitch" position on the liberal stage sealed up for years to come.
They wanted to be heard (not that anybody knows what they screamed), and they had to bare their beavers to make that happen. But their liberal women, bearing their beavers in public is hardly something new. NTTAWWT
Yea, I don't know what their vagina screamed, either. And I'm pretty sure I don't care. All I know is if I ever stumble across a vagina that's screaming, I'm not gonna walk away, I'm gonna run like Forrest Gump :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by BanHam:
- Republican lawmakers Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Rep. James Comer (R-KY) called on Wednesday night for an immediate Congressional investigation into 2020 election.
Jim Jordan is the Ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee and James Comer is the Ranking member on the Committee of Oversight and Reform.
The two Republican lawmakers called on Democrat leaders to investigate the controversial and highly contested 2020 election. The Republicans are asking for hearings on the 2020 elections as soon as possible.
A whataboutism in the first paragraph. Very professional. :-) [Reply]
Isn't this the same software MI, GA, WI, and PA counties used?
AUGUST 2, 2017 8:30 AMUPDATED 3 YEARS AGO
Venezuelan election turnout figures manipulated by one million votes: election company
LONDON (Reuters) - Turnout figures in Venezuela’s Constitutional Assembly election were manipulated up by least 1 million votes, Smartmatic, a company which has worked with Venezuela since 2004 on its voting system, said on Wednesday.
“We know, without any doubt, that the turnout of the recent election for a National Constituent Assembly was manipulated,” Smartmatic CEO Antonio Mugica said at a news briefing in London.
Mugica said Smartmatic, which has provided electronic voting technology for elections around the world, was able to detect the overstated officially announced turnout because of Venezuela’s automated election system.
“We estimate the difference between the actual participation and the one announced by authorities is at least 1 million votes,” he said.
Mugica declined to directly answer whether the manipulated turnout numbers changed the result of the election, in which authorities said 8.1 million people voted.
The election of the legislative super-body has been decried by critics as illegitimate and designed to give the unpopular government of President Nicolas Maduro powers to rewrite the constitution and sideline the opposition-led congress.
Mugica said the authorities in Venezuela would likely not be sympathetic to his comments and that he had not yet passed the evidence to the Venezuela’s electoral council.
The National Elections Council did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
According to internal electoral council data previously reviewed by Reuters, only 3.7 million people had voted by 5:30 p.m. in Venezuela’s election on Sunday.
Venezuelan authorities did not respond to a request for comment on that reviewed data.
Reporting by Cassandra Garrison, writing by Guy Faulconbridge; editing by John Stonestreet
There is no way to take the comments that were made for anything but subtle threats.
1) He said "probably go to..." based on where she lived, he doesn't actually know where her kids go to school
2) He was making a "you're racist" argument and asking her to think about what her kids friends, most likely majority black, would think of them knowing their mother is a racist
There is no way to take the comments that were made for anything but subtle threats.
It wasn't a threat at all, Shields68. I suggest you watch the video. The context was that the kids would be embarrassed when they had to face their fellow schoolmates. The school was named because black kids go there.
The tone of both rants in the two videos was to shame the two individuals. There were no threats. Go watch the videos. It's also peculiar how the school one perfectly cuts off. The awkward cut doesn't really work anyway for anyone with even a modicum of objectivity.
If you want to claim that those were threats, feel free to do so. That's called lying, however. [Reply]
