Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation.
“I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.
Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”
“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.
Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago.
“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.
Originally Posted by patteeu:
No. Security measures can be put in place and verifiably be enforced to give everyone more confidence in the result. Anti-Trumpers don’t care because they know that the absence of these security measures works in the favor of democrats more than Republicans.
"Reform" will be done on the back of a massive fraudulent election that elects Biden. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Loneiguana:
Remember when the Senate intelligence committee agreed Russia tried to interfere in our elections? Because of all the evidence before them?
Originally Posted by Merde Furieux:
US. Attorney, Mr. Peeler is the top-ranking federal law enforcement official in the Middle District of Georgia, which includes Albany, Athens, Columbus, Macon and Valdosta.
I'm sure he reviewed all the affidavits, grievances, and reports of election crimes with complete impartiality. :-)
You can trust Dhimmies. They would never, never, ever rig an election and then dismiss all the complaints of election fraud. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Merde Furieux:
US. Attorney, Mr. Peeler is the top-ranking federal law enforcement official in the Middle District of Georgia, which includes Albany, Athens, Columbus, Macon and Valdosta.
I'm sure he reviewed all the affidavits, grievances, and reports of election crimes with complete impartiality. :-)
Originally Posted by patteeu:
No. Security measures can be put in place and verifiably be enforced to give everyone more confidence in the result. Anti-Trumpers don’t care because they know that the absence of these security measures works in the favor of democrats more than Republicans.
The vast majority of America is confident in the results of our elections.
Providing evidence of fraud would change that.
Wonder why you guys haven't shown any yet?
Also, why did Mitch not allow a to fund election security if the GOP is so "concerned"? [Reply]
The short version of how they fucked up here goes:
The initial complaint Powell filed misses many basic things required to get the court to implement a Temporary Restraining Order, including showing they told the people they're suing about the suit. They said that complaint was a draft.
Their "corrected motion" says that they "will" tell the people they're suing, which is not particularly helpful if telling those people is a requirement for the judge issuing an order.
Because they didn't ask for a date for a hearing or a briefing schedule, didn't provide notice, and didn't say why this was such an "emergency", the judge is going to play this by the book, which means that no restraining order will be issued and defendants don't have to respond to the motion for at least three weeks, by which point the electoral college will have already met and rendered this whole thing moot.
These are not bright people, and things got out of hand
Oh look, patty is running away from addressing a point. Day ending in Y.
And not at all off topic.
You want to claim that there is less evidence of Russia involvement than evidence of voter fraud.
Unfortunately for your lies, there as been zero evidence of this so called voter fraud.
But according to the GOP led senate committee, we have the following evidence about Russia: The Russian government disrupted an American election to help Mr. Trump become president, Russian intelligence services viewed members of the Trump campaign as easily manipulated, investigators had uncovered information possibly tying Mr. Kilimnik to Russia’s major election interference operations, conducted by the intelligence service known as the G.R.U. ,and some of Mr. Trump’s advisers were eager for the help from an American adversary.
So let us know when a Senate Committee releases into official government record any voter fraud evidence that makes you statement anything other than dumbass lying.
We will wait.
Otherwise you are just outright lying again. [Reply]
When we can’t agree as a people on the purpose of government, or even about what human nature is, the next logical question is: how can we stay together as citizens? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Merde Furieux:
When we can’t agree as a people on the purpose of government, or even about what human nature is, the next logical question is: how can we stay together as citizens?
I agree. We should just kill anyone over the age of 55. [Reply]
