Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation.
“I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.
Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”
“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.
Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago.
“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.
Remember those multi-thousands of fake drivers licenses discovered in one state flooded with them that were from China? Whoooo ha!
Also ChiComs arriving in the middle of the night found delivering ballots. Xi bragging at a conference that Covid lockdowns will be the end of America too. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BanHam:
Kevin McCullough
@KMCRadio
· 7h
So #BigTweet nuked the account that first posted this but I will link here the SEC form that’s on file for the sale.
CHINA paid $400,000,000.00 to own @dominionvoting we believe just this past October. #ChinaOwnsDominionVoting
#ChinaOwnedTheElections
Name of investment bank please
Lol the document that he attached to that tweet shows absolutely nothing. You all are a bunch of fucking retards. [Reply]
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
There are so many states' elections being overturned that it's hard to keep track. Which ones have been flipped so far?
The short version of how they fucked up here goes:
The initial complaint Powell filed misses many basic things required to get the court to implement a Temporary Restraining Order, including showing they told the people they're suing about the suit. They said that complaint was a draft.
Their "corrected motion" says that they "will" tell the people they're suing, which is not particularly helpful if telling those people is a requirement for the judge issuing an order.
Because they didn't ask for a date for a hearing or a briefing schedule, didn't provide notice, and didn't say why this was such an "emergency", the judge is going to play this by the book, which means that no restraining order will be issued and defendants don't have to respond to the motion for at least three weeks, by which point the electoral college will have already met and rendered this whole thing moot.
These are not bright people, and things got out of hand [Reply]
Originally Posted by Snopes Hammer:
Crying "fraud" with no evidence when the election doesn't go your way doesn't warrant an investigation.
Whataboutism.
But I'll answer anyway.
There was tons of evidence that the Russians interfered with that election. That was the main part of that investigation. Seeing if Trump colluded, was part of that investigation and there was some evidence that his campaign did. Way more than there is of wrongdoing in this election.
That’s laughable. That’s what the focus of the investigation should have been, but it’s clear from what’s been revealed since that the focus was to find a crime to attribute to the President.
We’ll have to agree to disagree about the relative levels of evidence. [Reply]
Originally Posted by cosmo20002:
It was all pre-emptively complained about for 5 years, but we can see that even as the nonsense accusations get shot down (more voters than people! 1000s of dead people!), a new excuse pops up until we get to, "well the counters/officials/judges are just lying!" There's no end of the road here. No proof that would ever satisfy most of you Trumpers.
I know you don't actually believe this BS about Trump being cheated. It's sad you won't just come out and say it. Sad!
No. Security measures can be put in place and verifiably be enforced to give everyone more confidence in the result. Anti-Trumpers don’t care because they know that the absence of these security measures works in the favor of democrats more than Republicans. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Snopes Hammer:
Irrelevant to the point you brought up.
If I accuse you of shitting in my yard, is it on you to do a forensic analysis of the feces to show that it isn't your dookie, or is in on me to present evidence that you did it?
US. Attorney, Mr. Peeler is the top-ranking federal law enforcement official in the Middle District of Georgia, which includes Albany, Athens, Columbus, Macon and Valdosta.
I'm sure he reviewed all the affidavits, grievances, and reports of election crimes with complete impartiality. :-) [Reply]
