Originally Posted by Detoxing:
Why the fuck would i make a blog for? Dude, quit this bullshit. I'm not making a blog to appease you, why the fuck do you keep saying stupid shit?
I don't even have a FB, twitter or a personal IG, but imma make a blog for YOU? LOL
If you’re so passionate about this subject and you want to prove a point, why not? It’s totally normal and there’s nothing wrong with it whatsoever, right? I know you aren’t going to make the blog. That’s the point. No fucking normal person makes those blogs, and no normal parent would EVER let their kids grandparents make a blog where they offer their kids “raw and uncut” along with posting naked pics with offers for “unrated” versions.
These people are either so naive that they don’t understand how dangerous the internet is and that their blogs will surely attract some pedophiles, or they know exactly what they’re doing. There’s no other way around it, it’s one or the other.
But you can’t even acknowledge that it’s not normal, so that’s why I’m calling your bluff and suggesting you duplicate them with your children. Because I know you’re full of shit and wouldn’t do it under any circumstance. [Reply]
These people are either so naive that they don’t understand how dangerous the internet is and that their blogs will surely attract some pedophiles, or they know exactly what they’re doing. There’s no other way around it, it’s one or the other.
You're not calling any sort of bluff. This idea that im going to make a blog for you is ludicrous. It proves nothing and it's a complete waste of my time. You thinking you have some sort of win there is just....you're not that fucking dumb, quit acting like it.
And yes, people are that naive. I mean, look at you and bogus email bullshit. Look at TaQo. Look at MUH RUSSIA, MUH CHINA, MUH VOTER FRAUD.
Next, look at the date. 2009. The internet was a much different place 11 years ago. Yes, old grandmas in '09 probably weren't thinking about pedos and weird Q-anon fucks getting online and twisting their words a decade later. [Reply]
You continue to say “twisting their words” when I’m using exact quotes. I haven’t once twisted anything.
“Unrated” under a nude pic is self-explanatory. How am I twisting that dude? Your claim is disingenuous as fuck. Your only argument is that it was a joke. That’s it, because they said what they said and you know it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Taco John:
You shouldn't pity me. I'm too busy pitying you. Pity is wasted on me.
I was on to this stuff and posting about it on this forum before Q even existed. I understand Q better than anyone on this forum. I understand why the disinformation on it is necessary. I also understand much of what isn't disinformation. My news filter is calibrated much differently than anyone here because I've been awake to the FakeNews for over two decades now.
I would suggest that everyone on this forum prepare because we're going to see some rough days in 2021. The fraud that is being exposed in real-time isn't going to go unchecked - but it is going to go through. Nothing happens until AFTER the final nail is put into Trump's proverbial coffin. The electoral college will go through with their vote and Pence will be the final hammer that nails it shut.
Not until after the crime has been committed, and the crime scene is growing cold will anything happen. When it does happen, it will be sudden and shocking.
There are mechanics at play that could put us beyond that. Those mechanics involve whether Joe Biden needs to be actually sworn in before action is taken. I hope not, but that's a distinct possibility.
What I know is that this fraud will not go without being responded to, and that response will be equivalent to the crime of stealing an election. You don't have to believe me, but everyone should prepare "just in case." At the very least, you'll have a freezer with extra food that you can use for a Superbowl feast.
Originally Posted by Taco John:
You're wasting your breath. These things will be exposed in due time, but they will come in a chain that first exposes China's human trafficking abuses first and then connects US politicians to them.
There is an information nuclear bomb coming. The ground is being prepped for it now. Revelations about Swallwell, Kemp, Feinstein, and the CCP's tentacles in EU and US companies is the laser that is painting the ground. The only question is whether the bomb comes before Jan 20th or after. It just depends on what will make the biggest impact so that we can clear out the government and start anew.
Originally Posted by staylor26:
You continue to say “twisting their words” when I’m using exact quotes. I haven’t once twisted anything.
“Unrated” under a nude pic is self-explanatory. How am I twisting that dude? Your claim is disingenuous as fuck.
You're twisting the meaning of the words. I really need to explain that?
Do you know old people? Old white grandmas? They don't think like you. They're not always mind-rotted like you. They grew up in a different world than us. They don't always have a cynical, perverted view on life.
It seems like such a concept is difficult for you to understand. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Detoxing:
You're twisting the meaning of the words. I really need to explain that?
Do you know old people? Old white grandmas? They don't think like you. They're not always mind-rotted like you. They grew up in a different world than us. They don't always have a cynical, perverted view on life.
It seems like such a concept is difficult for you to understand.
What does “unrated” in reference to a naked baby pic really mean Detoxing? [Reply]
“Unrated” under a nude pic is self-explanatory. How am I twisting that dude? Your claim is disingenuous as fuck. Your only argument is that it was a joke. That’s it, because they said what they said and you know it.
That's literally all you have. An old grandma joked "unrated" under a censored pic of a nude infant.
It's a G-rated joke. A joke that even a child would make. Yet you think that's enough evidence to accuse someone of being a pedo.
And you think you're morally right here? Nuts. That's a deplorable accusation based on literally nothing.
There's ZERO evidence of anything illegal occurring. But because grandma made a joke a decade ago, not realizing people like you would exist a decade later, SHE's the creepy one :-)
Your view of people and world sucks. Seriously. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Detoxing:
That's literally all you have. An old grandma joked "unrated" under a censored pic of a nude infant.
It's a G-rated joke. A joke that even a child would make. Yet you think that's enough evidence to accuse someone of being a pedo.
And you think you're morally right here? Nuts. That's a deplorable accusation based on literally nothing.
There's ZERO evidence of anything illegal occurring. But because grandma made a joke a decade ago, not realizing people like you exist, SHE's the creepy one :-)
Your view of people and world sucks. Seriously.
Yea poor little grandma has no idea what she meant when she said:
“Unrated pics available to premium subscribers :-)”
They don’t know shit about the internet but they know what the term “premium subscribers” means. But at the same time, they don’t know what “unrated” means. Got it. [Reply]
