Originally Posted by Detoxing:
It was a fucking joke because the baby was nude in the pic, you goddamn pedo pusher. Only sick fucks like you find sexual context in a picture of a grandma holding an infant fresh out of a bath.
Who fucking jokes about offering naked pics of a baby on a blog for anybody, including pedophiles, to access?
You are assuming it’s a joke because you want to believe it is. You don’t know shit and you aren’t willing to even question it based on the fact that it’s clearly not normal behavior AT THE VERY LEAST.
But you can’t even acknowledge that. You want to pretend that this is typical behavior for a grandmother. It’s not. If it were, you would be able to provide examples to show it’s normal, but you can’t. Because no fucking grandparent in the world thinks it’s normal to have a blog where they offer them “online raw and uncut” while linking to another blog where a baby’s naked pictures are “available to premium subscribers”.
None of this is normal. Stop pretending it is and maybe I could take your argument seriously. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Detoxing:
It was a ****ing joke because the baby was nude in the pic, you goddamn pedo pusher. Only sick ****s like you find sexual context in a picture of a grandma holding an infant fresh out of a bath.
Who here gets all horned up when they see the "Nevermind" album cover? [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigBeauford:
Man this post really slaps, but particularly the bolded struck me as the words that describe why I get so invested in trying to make these people see the hypocrisy even when I am doing so in a trollish manner. Many posters on here have abandoned their values because they are so utterly convinced that the opposition would be somehow worse.
that's sooooo interesting because ya'll are the ones who have come up with every possible slur of the President's name to mock his supporters. Every, Single. Day.
Then labeled them a cult. Same shit Hitler did to Jews and Dims did to blacks
Ya'll don't have pot to piss in.
You willingly voted for a man in obvious cognitive decline with a VP in the wings who pulled 4%. You've put the country at major risk.
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Have you or anybody you know ever described your kids as “entertainment” for a party in an e-mail to another adult?
Did you also have a blog where you offered them “online raw and uncut”?
I absolutely have talked about my kids being entertainment. I might say skmetbing like “head on over for cocktail hour. It’s sure to be a blast, as we unwind from the weekend by listening to the chaotic screams of the kids”.
That would be funny to me and my friends and ironic (it’s big relaxing being around a bunch of kids). Like with the above: she’s being sarcastic in comparing the maelstrom of a bunch of little kids to high society life.
But in my example above, sick Q devotees would say that cocktail hour is code for hide the sausage until the kids scream with the chaos of our belzeebubbian rituals. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Who fucking jokes about offering naked pics of a baby on a blog for anybody, including pedophiles, to access?
Old grandmas who aren't aware freaks like you will twist that shit into child abuse?
Originally Posted by staylor26:
You are assuming it’s a joke because you want to believe it is. You don’t know shit and you aren’t willing to even question it based on that fact that it’s clearly not normal behavior AT THE VERY LEAST.
But you can’t even acknowledge that. You want to pretend that this is typical behavior for a grandmother. It’s not. If it were, you would be able to provide examples to show it’s normal, but you can’t. Because no fucking grandparent in the world thinks it’s normal to have a blog where they offer them “online raw and uncut” while linking to another blog where a baby’s naked pictures are “available to premium subscribers”.
Staylor wants me to hunt the internet for similar grandma blogs as "proof" that this is abnormal. :-) [Reply]
> Might as well. I’ll live-blog it.
>
> From: Drew Littman
> Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 1:25 PM
> To: Tamera Luzzatto
> Cc: Trudy Vincent , Jon Haber-work <
> jhaber@cascadestrategy.com>, Bonnie Levin-work ,
> "lsavage55@verizon.net" , Katherine Klein <
> kleinK@wharton.upenn.edu>, John Gomperts , Mary
> Podesta , Luke Albee , Beth
> Donovan , Tom Rosenstiel-personal <
> tom.rosenstiel@gmail.com>, Ruth Marcus , "
> jon.leibowitz@davispolk.com" , Rima Sirota <
> rimasirota@gmail.com>, Drew Fields , John
> Podesta , David Leiter ,
> Laurie Rubiner-work , Chris Spanos <
> chrisspanos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Farmers L Update and Welcome Mat
>
> Thanks for remembering me, as I was planning to use the farm as the
> backdrop to announce my candidacy for speaker of the house. [Reply]
Originally Posted by :
Thanks for remembering me, as I was planning to use the farm as the
> backdrop to announce my candidacy for speaker of the house.
Wow, helluva pedo party that homie was going even announce his candidacy for speaker of the house.
Originally Posted by NewChief:
I absolutely have talked about my kids being entertainment. I might say skmetbing like “head on over for cocktail hour. It’s sure to be a blast, as we unwind from the weekend by listening to the chaotic screams of the kids”.
That would be funny to me and my friends and ironic (it’s big relaxing being around a bunch of kids). Like with the above: she’s being sarcastic in comparing the maelstrom of a bunch of little kids to high society life.
But in my example above, sick Q devotees would say that cocktail hour is code for hide the sausage until the kids scream with the chaos of our belzeebubbian rituals.
Have you offered them “online raw and uncut” on a blog that you made for them? Did you post a link to another blog with naked pics of a baby and say “unrated pics available to premium subscribers”?
It’s not about just one thing. It’s about the entire thing as a whole. It’s fucking weird and if we can’t at least agree on that there’s really no point in having this conversation because only a close minded fool would try and pretend that it’s normal. [Reply]
The fucking email chain is a bunch of people CC'd, writing her back confirming that they'll be there.
But yeah, sure the kids were sent their for "adult entertainment".
If you can't read the original email in context to see what was REALLY occurring, then fuck you. Seriously. You aint worth my time. The evidence is right there. [Reply]
Detoxing you should start a blog of your kids and offer them “online raw and uncut” since there’s clearly nothing wrong or weird about it. Then throw in edited naked pics and offer “unrated” versions to premium subscribers.
Send me a link when you’re finished. Then maybe I’ll believe you that you think it’s normal behavior. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Have you offered them “online raw and uncut”? Did you link them to another blog with naked pics of a baby and say “unrated pics available to premium subscribers”?
It’s not about just one thing. It’s about the entire thing as a whole. It’s fucking weird and if we can’t at least agree on that there’s really no point in having this conversation because only a close minded fool would try and pretend that it’s normal.
Dude says "might as well live blog it".
Sounds like a pedo party to me! Live blog and everything.
But Staylor will tell you YOU'RE the close minded one...even though fucking full email chain tells you EXACTLY what this was about....nothing pedo about it [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Detoxing you should start a blog on your kids and offer them “online raw and uncut” since there’s clearly nothing wrong or weird about it. Then throw in naked pics and offer “unrated” versions to premium subscribers.
Send me a link when you’re finished. Then maybe I’ll believe you that you think it’s normal behavior.
So you won't actually address the email chain i pointed out? Just gonna keep ignoring all the people she cc'd and all the people who confirmed they'll be there?
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Have you offered them “online raw and uncut”? Did you link them to another blog with naked pics of a baby and say “unrated pics available to premium subscribers”?
It’s not about just one thing. It’s about the entire thing as a whole. It’s ****ing weird and if we can’t at least agree on that there’s really no point in having this conversation because only a close minded fool would try and pretend that it’s normal.
You also won’t take the “entire thing as a whole” and only see the pieces that confirm your bias (likely because that is how it was presented to you by the “research” you did). And he’s talking about “raw and uncut” pics or vids of my kids, so my friends, is absolutely something I might say. As in “here’s a glimpse of my son in 5 seconds, just imagine what the raw uncut version I’m about to launch will be like!” Groups of friends have goofy ass jokes. [Reply]
