ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 41 of 89
« First < 313738394041 4243444551 > Last »
Patteeu Memorial Political Forum>Durham Arrest Watch - Tracking impending arrests in DOJ/FBI criminal investigation
Taco John 05:46 PM 12-15-2019
This interview seems like "required reading" at this point:


[Reply]
MGRS13 09:02 PM 12-03-2020
What’s really funny? I have no idea what the hell the bull durham bulls scandal was about nor do I care, you know same as the rest of the country. But who ever you nut jobs wanted fired or locked up, or whatever, no the best thing is Barr is the only person mentioned in this thread that will be fired. Seriously it’s hilarious. You can’t make this shit up.
[Reply]
Just Passin' By 09:19 PM 12-03-2020

Appears the dossier was all the rage at the Brookings Institution... https://t.co/0FCQXghWHv

— Byron York (@ByronYork) December 4, 2020

[Reply]
eDave 09:19 PM 12-03-2020
Trump aide banned from Justice Dept. building after trying to get election case info
[Reply]
GloryDayz 09:34 PM 12-03-2020
Originally Posted by eDave:
Trump aide banned from Justice Dept. building after trying to get election case info
Banned for wanting the truth, well that offends fucking ignorant assholes the world over.
[Reply]
Lex Luthor 12:20 AM 12-04-2020
Taco Wrong started this thread over a year ago.

How many people have been arrested? I assume it must be dozens by now.
[Reply]
BanHam 06:45 PM 12-22-2020
Sean Davis
@seanmdav
·
2h
The White House announced today that Trump signed an order on Dec. 18 giving John Durham the authority to present classified information to a grand jury investigating the Russian collusion hoax.

Previous DOJ regulations required the consent of the specific classifying agency.





[Reply]
FD 05:40 PM 01-29-2021
Slap on the wrist for Clinesmith.

Originally Posted by :
Ex-FBI Lawyer Clinesmith Given Probation after Admitting He Doctored Email in Trump Probe

...


However, the judge said he agreed with an earlier finding by the Justice Department Inspector General that Clinesmith and other FBI officials’ actions were not caused by political bias and that he believes Clinesmith’s claims that he thought that the information he was adding to the email was accurate.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/...n-trump-probe/
[Reply]
Just Passin' By 06:03 PM 01-29-2021
Originally Posted by FD:
Slap on the wrist for Clinesmith.



https://www.nationalreview.com/news/...n-trump-probe/


I just can't imagine why people all along the political spectrum are losing faith in the government...
[Reply]
Ninerfan11 12:32 AM 05-03-2021
Whatever happened to Durham? Does he actually exist?
[Reply]
Ninerfan11 04:22 PM 05-04-2021
lol
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 12:52 PM 09-16-2021
John Durham Will Seek Indictment of Democratic Lawyer for Allegedly Lying to the F.B.I. During ‘Russian Collusion’ Investigation

This is a lawyer or Hillary, DNC and Democrat politicisn from Perkins Coie.

Former U.S. Attorney John Durham has told the Justice Department he will ask a grand jury to indict cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann for allegedly lying to the F.B.I. during the “Russian collusion” investigation, according to the New York Times.[<—behind a paywall]
Forgot link:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...investigation/

But Times report is behind a paywall.
[Reply]
banyon 02:06 PM 09-16-2021
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill...-reports%3famp

The lawyer, Michael Sussman, whose firm Perkins Coie has previously represented the Democratic National Committee, is expected to be indicted for making a false statement when he raised concerns over whether computer servers linked to the Trump Organization were in convert communications with a Russian bank.

At issue is whether Sussman was telling the truth about whether he was representing a client and who that client may have been, the Post and the Times reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

During a conversation with the FBI's then-top lawyer, James Baker, Sussman on Sept. 19,

2016, said he was not representing a client. But congressional investigators said Sussman told them he was there on behalf of a cybersecurity researcher, the Post noted. Sussman denied accusations that he had committed wrongdoing, including claims that he was working on behalf of Hillary Clinton's campaign.

Says the SOL expires this weekend.
[Reply]
banyon 02:37 PM 09-16-2021

BREAKING: A federal grand jury has returned an indictment against cybersecurity attorney Michael Sussmann, who represented the DNC in connection with the 2016 Russia hack. The indictment was sought by Special Counsel John Durham. https://t.co/5msqPMbEUA

— Ryan J. Reilly (@ryanjreilly) September 16, 2021

[Reply]
BucEyedPea 03:46 PM 09-16-2021
Ronald Reagan's favorite paper reporting the same topic with this headline, saying he was indicted.

Prominent Cybersecurity Lawyer Indicted on Charge of Lying to FBI During Meeting on Trump, Russia


A prominent cybersecurity lawyer was indicted on a charge of lying to the FBI during a meeting about the Trump Russia hoax, the Justice Department announced Thursday.

Michael E. Sussman’s indictment was expected, after he was accused of making a false statement about his client during the meeting, the New York Times reports.

Sussman’s lawyers denied the accusation and vowed to fight any charge in court.

https://humanevents.com/2021/09/16/p...-trump-russia/

[Reply]
|Zach| 04:32 PM 09-16-2021
Ironically, if you read the indictment it seems that instead of investigating the investigators and nailing the “deep state”, Durham instead investigated a few people trying to feed the investigators bad info and gives the FBI/Mueller a pat of the back for not falling for it.
[Reply]
Page 41 of 89
« First < 313738394041 4243444551 > Last »
Up