We'll, that was a fuck ton of nonsense to scroll past. Knock that off or I'll start booting dudes from the thread.
I thought it was fun. Not on the level of the first one, but I think they're turning this into an episodic series where they're just meant to be fun stories rather than epic blockbusters. I was entertained. [Reply]
It was okay; the ending was sort of silly and the main plot line was really thin. Not sure where the clues were, I must have been trying to enjoy the women in bikinis. [Reply]
I found the movie to be somewhat enjoyable. It was a bit long, definitely had the Hercule Poirot vibe going but that was OK. It got a bit confusing to me once all the reveal shit started happening, but not too bad.
I like a whodunnit, so does my wife, so I can see us watching this again. Not as good as the first, but it was fun. [Reply]
I had to pause the movie and walk through my house, I was laughing so hard about Benoit solving the murder mystery that Norton's character had carefully constructed.
Rian Johnson is a really good director, but what he's great at is subverting expectations at every turn.
Entertaining, but not as much as the first one. Suspension of disbelief was pushed to the limit for me, but overall an enjoyable film. I think the first one had a better cast, but I am a Bautista, Norton, and Craig fan. [Reply]
Critical Drinker wasn't terribly impressed by the film.
Originally Posted by :
Watching glass onion is like watching someone that’s never played chess in their entire lives trying to take on a grandmaster, making up new rules and moves as they go to support the mistaken belief that they actually know what they’re doing. It’s the ego-stroking pretentiousness of a filmmaker whose aspirations and self-belief far exceed his actual abilities. And it’s an insult to a genre that deserves far better than this gaudy, superficial trash.