Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
Cleveland is a damned good football team. Mayfield isn't Mahomes, but he's a damned good QB. We'll be seeing them again in January.
Our OL is improved, but will indeed need a little time to really gel.
Thornhill is back.
Bolton is going to be very, very good.
This defense really missed Honey Badger in the first half, and despite not having the stats, Clark is still a really important player.
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
You do realize how stupid that sounds, right? Two plays decided that game.
It's not stupid at all. When we were the same old Chiefs, the team was competitive but lost heartbreaking games to elite QBs ALL THE FUCKING TIME just like that. I'm not holding them to any different standards than the Chiefs pre Mahomes. Sorry dude but Faker just isn't that guy to put them over. He is simply awful in pure passing situations. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother:
It's not stupid at all. When we were the same old Chiefs, the team was competitive but lost heartbreaking games to elite QBs ALL THE ****ING TIME just like that. I'm not holding them to any different standards than the Chiefs pre Mahomes. Sorry dude but Faker just isn't that guy to put them over. He is simply awful in pure passing situations.
Same old Browns were 0-16. If that's the same old Browns, then The Chiefs are in serious trouble. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
Same old Browns were 0-16. If that's the same old Browns, then The Chiefs are in serious trouble.
It's not about 0-16. It's about winning a Superbowl. The Chiefs won plenty of games during the time of same old Chiefs. Faker isn't the guy to get it done in the clutch [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother:
It's not about 0-16. It's about winning a Superbowl. The Chiefs won plenty of games during the time of same old Chiefs. Faker isn't the guy to get it done in the clutch
'SAME OLD BROWNS' implies that they are the SAME as they always are, which is nowhere near being true.
Not good enough to beat the Chiefs? Well yeah, obviously. They played a whale of a game and came up short. How many teams have beaten the Chiefs in a game they were trying to win in the last like two years? Very, very, few.
To say they're THE SAME OLD BROWNS' is a completely ridiculous statement. They're a real damned good team, and just aren't as good as Kansas City. Just like Baker played a really good game but the INT where he was being tripped as he threw and the blocked punt were the difference in the game.
Every QB who's not Mahomes doesn't suck. Your entire lens of viewing football is skewed.
There's Mahomes, and there's Rodgers, and then there's the next tier of normal human QB's that down, distance, and situation matter as to their effectiveness.
Just because Mayfield's not Mahomes doesn't mean he sucks. Just because they couldn't quite beat the Chiefs doesn't mean they're THE SAME OLD BROWNS.
That's just dumb. We'll see them again, and if we're relatively healthy, we'll beat them again-because we rarely lose when we're healthy and certainly not an important play-off game.
That doesn't mean they suck. You have a totally binary concept of football. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
'SAME OLD BROWNS' implies that they are the SAME as they always are, which is nowhere near being true.
Not good enough to beat the Chiefs? Well yeah, obviously. They played a whale of a game and came up short. How many teams have beaten the Chiefs in a game they were trying to win in the last like two years? Very, very, few.
To say they're THE SAME OLD BROWNS' is a completely ridiculous statement. They're a real damned good team, and just aren't as good as Kansas City. Just like Baker played a really good game but the INT where he was being tripped as he threw and the blocked punt were the difference in the game.
Every QB who's not Mahomes doesn't suck. Your entire lens of viewing football is skewed.
There's Mahomes, and there's Rodgers, and then there's the next tier of normal human QB's that down, distance, and situation matter as to their effectiveness.
Just because Mayfield's not Mahomes doesn't mean he sucks. Just because they couldn't quite beat the Chiefs doesn't mean they're THE SAME OLD BROWNS.
That's just dumb. We'll see them again, and if we're relatively healthy, we'll beat them again-because we rarely lose when we're healthy and certainly not an important play-off game.
That doesn't mean they suck. You have a totally binary concept of football.
You don't understand do you. They are the same old sorry ass Browns and will be until proven otherwise. Regular season wins mean jack shit [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother:
You don't understand do you. They are the same old sorry ass Browns and will be until proven otherwise. Regular season wins mean jack shit
?
so unless they win the SB, they're the same as the 0-16 team?
