No spoiled picks in this thread, all weekend. This means that as tweets are leaking picks a few minutes before the selection is announced live, you don't post it in this thread (ex: embedded tweets), reference it in this thread (ex: Joe Slapdick says it's So and So to Green Bay) or hint at it (ex: "it's a RB!").
Don't be a dick.
Otherwise, have fun, talk shit, freak out and lose your goddamned minds. It's Draft Weekend. The hot takes in these threads are so funny. I'll also be starting player threads for each of our picks as they are made, with videos and notable stats/takes in the OP. Pure knee jerk gold to reference in the future.
Originally Posted by Red Dawg:
I know this much. We have zero skill players that would have gone top 10 and our offense is pretty fucking good. These are wasted picks.
What are you talking about?
In an NFL re-draft, Hill and Kelce are top-5 picks. Mahomes is a #1 pick for a generation. [Reply]
Originally Posted by jjchieffan:
Pitts is great, no doubt. But I just can't see how a team takes a TE with a top 5 pick. You know that there had to be offers to trade down.
Because this isn't Keizer we are talking about here. Would you have given up a Top 5 pick for Kelce? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Coach:
No you don't. There isn't a defensive player that is worthy of being a top 10, hence why I mentioned that they could have traded out if they wanted to.
They didn't. They picked BPA, regardless of position.
This ain't your 1960's football where teams pick based on needs. Man, you're behind the 8 ball these days, it's just sad.
I would take Surtain in the back of the top 10. But they could have traded further back and taken someone and gotten more picks. [Reply]
