OT Rankings - Page 17 - ChiefsPlanet

Originally Posted by The Franchise:

Oklahoma State OT Teven Jenkins on what teams are getting if they draft him.

"Tough, physical, nasty motherfucker. A dude who does not shy away from hits. A dude's who is going to bust his ass."
— Alex Kozora (@Alex_Kozora) April 1, 2021

Love the “motherfucker” thrown in there. That’s how I know it’s genuine.
[Reply]

I think Cosmi is gonna be there around our pick if we want him. I would love Jenkins but as I said a few days ago, I think he’s going to the Steeelers. Not sure he’ll be available to us
[Reply]

Originally Posted by The Franchise:

Oklahoma State OT Teven Jenkins on what teams are getting if they draft him.

"Tough, physical, nasty motherfucker. A dude who does not shy away from hits. A dude's who is going to bust his ass."
— Alex Kozora (@Alex_Kozora) April 1, 2021

[Reply]

Sewell has shorter arms, this class is so freaking weird.
[Reply]

I think they want Teven Jenkins and I think Veach is going to try to get that guy if he falls into the early 20’s
[Reply]

No https://t.co/9I7n5DO3hn
— Mitchell Schwartz (@MitchSchwartz71) April 5, 2021

[Reply]

Originally Posted by The Franchise:

No https://t.co/9I7n5DO3hn
— Mitchell Schwartz (@MitchSchwartz71) April 5, 2021

I kind of agree.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by staylor26:
I kind of agree.

Niang played RT in college because they already had a LT. That offense wanted a guy like him at RT because it's that important.

The way passing offenses work nowadays - plus the fact that teams move their pass rushers all over to get mismatches - I don't think there's really that much difference at all.

Especially when you have Mahomes tip toeing all over the field.
[Reply]

We will also be having OTA’s per Goodell so that will play a big role for an OT getting up to speed.
[Reply]

If we were to take Jenkins at #31, I'd say it's an even bet that Niang plays LT.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
If we were to take Jenkins at #31, I'd say it's an even bet that Niang plays LT.

Yep.

Or maybe they've already penciled in Niang at LT, which is why Remmers' agent said he was the Week 1 starter.

To be quite honest, I'm not sure I see the difference between drafting Jenkins at #31, only to switch him over to the left side, and starting Niang at LT.

I mean, if they're going to move a guy, why not move the guy that's spent the last year training per the Chiefs instruction?
[Reply]

If they only need a RT then there isn’t a need to take one in the first round unless one falls.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by The Franchise:
If they only need a RT then there isn’t a need to take one in the first round unless one falls.

not a NEED in round one, but The Chiefs have shown they're willing to spend resources on RT. Schwartz was paid pretty well. I think in this offense in particular it's pretty important.

If Jenkins is there at #31, I wouldn't balk at grabbing him, and I'd expect they move one or the other of him or Niang to LT. Niang seems more nimble to me, but that's just going off of memory.

And just my fixation on Niang looking like Roaf in his build and movements.

but whatever they do I'm sure there's a plan that will be sufficient at least.
[Reply]

If they actually plan to move Niang to the LT position, Stone Forsyth at #63 would not only be great value, but the Chiefs would have their tackle positions solidified for the next 4 years.
[Reply]

It would be a massive risk for this team to covert a RT rookie into a LT and start him straight away...a very big risk. Jenkins is good but is he really a can't miss talent? I'm not sure tbh.
[Reply]