I'd think for that kind of money I'd find somebody to make her quietly die of natural causes.

Darn, and I loved her so.
[Reply]

So your options are (1) live life with a measly $70 billion, or (2) risk going to jail for the rest of your life, and you choose option 2? That's some good decision-making going on there.
[Reply]

Multi-billionaires can afford to hire the guys who don't get caught.
[Reply]

I look forward to hearing her name on all the Forbes most wealthy lists, along with the Walton kids.
[Reply]

Her fulfillment has been met
[Reply]

Amazon is going to sell nothing but handmade soaps and knitted scarves once this is all over and done.
[Reply]

She pushed out 4 of his kids and was there from the beginning.


She deserves 1/2 of everything.
[Reply]

No, she doesn't.

Even 200 million per kid with another 500 million for her might be acceptable. Not 70 billion.
[Reply]

Seriously though, why in the hell do any of you care about what she gets? They're both going to end up with more than they'll ever be able to spend.
[Reply]

Because it's indicative of a greater legal/social issue that affects anybody who gets married, not just the extremely wealthy.
[Reply]

No, it's not. You can't compare these cases to middle class divorces in any way.
[Reply]

matter of principle. : a situation that requires something be done a certain way because one believes it is the only right way, It was a matter of principle
[Reply]

Sure, but the law doesn't really adjust for absurd wealth, so it is what it is.
[Reply]

True

Doesn't make it right but true. Antiquated law that should be changed.
[Reply]

There's no right or wrong in this case. Everyone is going to come out ok. Trust me.
[Reply]