ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 6 of 408
« First < 23456 789101656106 > Last »
Patteeu Memorial Political Forum>Sidney Powell: "We're Getting Ready To Overturn Election Results In Multiple States
BanHam 07:04 PM 11-15-2020
Sun, 11/15/2020 - 18:00

Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.

“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation.

“I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.

Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.

Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.

“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has.

“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”

“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.

Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.

“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago.

“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”

Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.

During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-...s_3579599.html
[Reply]
Rausch 10:33 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
But still exposed. Who exposed them is irrelevant.
And the explanation is complete bs.

They have never lost a case in court. All their material can be viewed in total.

They have been slandered by news agencies and VINDICATED in court repeatedly...
[Reply]
jd1020 10:34 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by Rausch:
That isn't necessary.

If mail comes in the 5th and you tell someone to stamp the 3rd on it that's back dating. You could call it double dating or flibby flarb but it's still back dating...
He never heard the words stamp. Back date. Nothing. Listen to his interview. He heard them talking about a box of ballots they were opening on the 4th and they were all post marked on the 3rd except for one that was post marked on the 4th.

Opening a box of ballots that are already post marked and back dating/post marking ballots after opening the box are 2 entirely different things.
[Reply]
Rausch 10:34 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Why? Trump contended that he won the PV in 2016. Trump contended that his inauguration crowd size was the largest ever. And so on.
If everyone else is using steroids (cheating) you either expose it or use it yourself.
[Reply]
Donger 10:36 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by Rausch:
So people stating they saw the numbers flip, at the polls, is anecdotes and not to be believed? Errors were corrected and not a single democrat argued this was incorrect, but you dispute that?

Do you dispute the video of the rep paying a woman to "harvest" votes illegally in Texas? Trading gifts for votes. Telling elderly people to change their votes to who she wanted.
Again, I don't care what people claim. I care about what they can PROVE. Don't you?

What errors?

I haven't seen this video, or the rest of that.
[Reply]
Chiefshrink 10:37 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by Rausch:
And the explanation is complete bs.

They have never lost a case in court. All their material can be viewed in total.

They have been slandered by news agencies and VINDICATED in court repeatedly...
Exactly!!
[Reply]
Donger 10:37 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by Rausch:
If everyone else is using steroids (cheating) you either expose it or use it yourself.
Right, and how did that presidential commission into voter fraud in 2016 work out?
[Reply]
Rausch 10:38 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Right, and how did that presidential commission into voter fraud in 2016 work out?
I think it would be fair to also spend 2 years on this one.

Tit for tat.

I mean, there actually is evidence there was fraud in this case...
[Reply]
jd1020 10:40 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by Rausch:
I think it would be fair to also spend 2 years on this one.

Tit for tat.

I mean, there actually is evidence there was fraud in this case...
But there isn't.

Lawyers don't drop the meat of their argument if they have evidence.
[Reply]
Donger 10:43 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by Rausch:
I think it would be fair to also spend 2 years on this one.

Tit for tat.

I mean, there actually is evidence there was fraud in this case...
Sorry, I think I'll go with this for now:

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
[Reply]
tyreekthefreak 10:45 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Right, and how did that presidential commission into voter fraud in 2016 work out?
Yeah, Trump was looking at the Russians when he should have been looking at the fucking dems! Democrats are getting rich off chumps like you !
[Reply]
AdolfOliverBush 10:45 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by Rausch:
And the explanation is complete bs.

They have never lost a case in court. All their material can be viewed in total.

They have been slandered by news agencies and VINDICATED in court repeatedly...
O'Keefe has a criminal record. In 2013 he lost in court (related to the Acorn nonsense), and was ordered to pay Juan Carlos Vera $100,000.

That's after about 2 minutes of looking into it. I'm guessing there is more.
[Reply]
jd1020 10:46 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by tyreekthefreak:
Yeah, Trump was looking at the Russians when he should have been looking at the fucking dems! Democrats are getting rich off chumps like you !
And Trump isn't making a nickel off of all this publicity...
[Reply]
Donger 10:48 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by tyreekthefreak:
Yeah, Trump was looking at the Russians when he should have been looking at the ****ing dems! Democrats are getting rich off chumps like you !
Actually, I believe his claim was that millions of illegals voted in 2016, and that's why he lost.
[Reply]
Loneiguana 10:50 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by Rausch:

There is the project veritas expose of a mailman overhearing his boss telling people to back date ballots to the 3rd instead of the 4th or 5th.
Just so you are aware, that post office had like a total of two ballots that after the election with a nov 3rd postmark go through and they voted for Trump.

They are throwing anything and everything at the wall hoping that people like you just repeat it with zero knowledge of what is actually going on.

Seriously, you are helping normalize attacking our elections with easily debunked shit like this.
[Reply]
IowaHawkeyeChief 11:08 AM 11-16-2020
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
The wishful thinking is pathetic. Trump lost because he was an inferior candidate, even though his opponent is an animated corpse. The lesson here is: If you want a second term, don't be an asshole during your entire first term.

This is an even bigger choke job than Hillary pulled in 2016.
Again, not true... If the 'Rona wasn't unleashed by China, then Katrina'd by the MSM, Trump wins easily. Hell, he only lost by combines 60-70k in 3 states that would have put him at 270+ with the virus...
[Reply]
Page 6 of 408
« First < 23456 789101656106 > Last »
Up