as a reminder he made a lot of clutch plays for the Chiefs AND I will never forget that ever because he was a contributor for the Chiefs most memorable season.
If it wasn’t for Sorenson Chiefs may not have made or won the SuperBowl?
Remember the Texans game? When he made that clutch stop on the fake punt? Also, when he forced a fumble on a kick return that led to a TD? If it wasn’t for him Chiefs may not win that game and no SuperBowl either. He contributed big time turning that game around and that game was a turning point for the Chiefs in the playoffs.
I understand the hate playing him as a starting safety. He ain’t that but as a role player that makes clutch here and there, I’ll gladly take that on my team any day of the week.
The what have you done for me lately sometimes clouds our perspectives of the overall picture. Daniel Sorenson isn’t a starting safety but is a great role player . Nothing more. He still deserves a spot on this team IMO if used Properly. Role player that’s it.
I’m not here to stick up for Sorenson but I do think he deserves less hate. The source of frustration should be directed more to Spags than anything for playing him as a starting safety. [Reply]
Originally Posted by morphius:
I believe there was TD earlier that he got beat on and did give up a score. I want to like the guy, but just not seeing enough good to have them out there. I wish Mahomes could go up against him in a game...
Originally Posted by bricks:
as a reminder he made a lot of clutch plays for the Chiefs AND I will never forget that ever because he was a contributor for the Chiefs most memorable season.
If it wasn’t for Sorenson Chiefs may not have made or won the SuperBowl?
Remember the Texans game? When he made that clutch stop on the fake punt? Also, when he forced a fumble on a kick return that led to a TD? If it wasn’t for him Chiefs may not win that game and no SuperBowl either. He contributed big time turning that game around and that game was a turning point for the Chiefs in the playoffs.
I understand the hate playing him as a starting safety. He ain’t that but as a role player that makes clutch here and there, I’ll gladly take that on my team any day of the week.
The what have you done for me lately sometimes clouds our perspectives of the overall picture. Daniel Sorenson isn’t a starting safety but is a great role player . Nothing more. He still deserves a spot on this team IMO if used Properly. Role player that’s it.
I’m not here to stick up for Sorenson but I do think he deserves less hate. The source of frustration should be directed more to Spags than anything for playing him as a starting safety.
It's the other way around. What he's done before clouds people's judgement of him right now. He's regressed insanely. I don't care what position you put him in, he should not be starting on any team in the NFL. Period.
I'll never forget what he did in the playoffs these last few years, but that's zero excuse for his abysmal play this season. He's literally cost us games at this point. [Reply]
Hate Sorensen? Absolutely not. He was a key piece of the amazing run for KC.
Is it time to move on from him? Absolutely. You have to know when it's time to cut bait with a player and it looked like the decline started last year. He could still be of some value on special teams and as a guy that can spell a player for a few plays, but he shouldn't be starting or playing any significant snaps anymore. So you get what we have here now, and that's a lot of anger from everyone just wanting him off the field. It's warranted. [Reply]
I don't hate him. He's a lifelong Chief and has made some crucial plays for us.
Like others have said, it's just very frustrating to see a player constantly get beat like he has this season. It's bad and it is killing this defense. [Reply]
Having Sorenson on the team is fine. He would be a good special teamer/backup. He just shouldn't be starting. No way should he be playing 100% of the defensive snaps. [Reply]
