Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy:
That's not why the Chiefs cut him though. It's because he lied! Lol.....
Lying to your employer is way worse than what Vick did. Chiefs should never have given Kareem a second chance like Vick got because Kareem lied. Gee such great logic there.
Feel free to go root for the Eagles.
The Kansas City Chiefs were not lining up to sign Michael Vick fresh out of prison. Try to stay focused on the organization in the discussion, you'll at least appear like you have a brain cell that is still moving. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Wallcrawler:
Feel free to go root for the Eagles.
The Kansas City Chiefs were not lining up to sign Michael Vick fresh out of prison. Try to stay focused on the organization in the discussion, you'll at least appear like you have a brain cell that is still moving.
Chiefs since Reid has been here have a history of drafting and signing players with questionable backgrounds.
My post was more in reference to Reid, not the Eagles. Maybe learn how to comprehend what you read and you won't come off as such an idiot. [Reply]
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy:
Chiefs since Reid has been here have a history of drafting and signing players with questionable backgrounds.
My post was more in reference to Reid, not the Eagles. Maybe learn how to comprehend what you read and you won't come off as such an idiot.
The Kansas City Chiefs owner, Lamar Hunt, fired Kareem Hunt.
The Kansas City Chiefs had no interest in Michael Vick coming out of prison.
Your references to Michael Vick getting a shot with the Eagles has nothing to do with the Kansas City Chiefs organization. Just because one team does something stupid, does not mean another team should follow suit.
Andy Reid probably would have kept Hunt. Every coach wants as much talent as they can get. This has nothing to do with Andy Reid.
Apparently you have no issue with a repeat violent offender who lies to the face of ownership. Unfortunately for you, in the real world, that shit doesn't fly. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Wallcrawler: The Kansas City Chiefs owner, Lamar Hunt, fired Kareem Hunt.
The Kansas City Chiefs had no interest in Michael Vick coming out of prison.
Your references to Michael Vick getting a shot with the Eagles has nothing to do with the Kansas City Chiefs organization. Just because one team does something stupid, does not mean another team should follow suit.
Andy Reid probably would have kept Hunt. Every coach wants as much talent as they can get. This has nothing to do with Andy Reid.
Apparently you have no issue with a repeat violent offender who lies to the face of ownership. Unfortunately for you, in the real world, that shit doesn't fly.
Holy shit, Clark must've been seriously pissed to hire a mother fucking necromancer. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ThaVirus:
Kareem was a dipshit, for sure. Guy was on a multi-million dollar contract and represented a billion dollar franchise. The last thing he needed to be doing was arguing with some dumb ass drunk girl.. but TMZ really ****ed us with that video drop. They titled it "Kareem Hunt BRUTALIZES and kicks woman in hotel video" :-)
That is a ****ing affront to the English language, as well as a complete fabrication of what we all plainly saw on the damned video. Brutalize my ****ing ass!
I agree what he did wasn't that bad.
He didn't get cut for what he did, he got cut for repeatedly lying by telling the owner he never left the hotel room.
Had he been honest he doesn't get cut. Though the NFL would have still suspended him for the rest of that season and the other 8 games.
Would you trade for Kareem hunt? Last year of his contract with browns. Saves them $6M with no dead money and they have rb depth. If so, what would you give for him. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kcbubb:
Would you trade for Kareem hunt? Last year of his contract with browns. Saves them $6M with no dead money and they have rb depth. If so, what would you give for him.
