Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
I can't figure why the Chiefs would cut Super Bowl star Damien Williams, only to turn around and sign another oft-injured, 29 year old running back but okay, I guess?
It seems like an odd signing.
Because McKinnon is likely signing a vet min deal where Williams made a couple mill. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Because McKinnon is likely signing a vet min deal where Williams made a couple mill.
Yeah, but it's not like the Chiefs don't have that extra $1 million in cap space for a guy that could have easily been the Chiefs Super Bowl MVP in 2019.
Originally Posted by BossChief:
He was healthy and pretty damn good last year.
I like this signing, but I understand the concern
He had 592 yards from scrimmage last year but I wouldn't expect much from him due to his age (29 years old in a few days) and his long injury history.
I'd rather see the Chiefs take a complimentary back in the 5th than take a chance on another broke dick but I guess that's on the table until Saturday afternoon. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
He had 592 yards from scrimmage last year but I wouldn't expect much from him due to his age (29 years old in a few days) and his long injury history.
I'd rather see the Chiefs take a complimentary back in the 5th than take a chance on another broke dick but I guess that's on the table until Saturday afternoon.
I’d rather they sign an UDFA RB instead of spending a pick on one. [Reply]