Father in viral video of school board arrest says his daughter was raped in school bathroom.
On June 22, Scott Smith was arrested at a Loudoun County, Virginia, school board meeting, a meeting that was ultimately deemed an “unlawful assembly” after many attendees vocally opposed a policy on transgender students.
What people did not know is that weeks prior on May 28, Smith says, a boy allegedly wearing a skirt entered a girls’ bathroom at nearby Stone Bridge High School, where he sexually assaulted Smith’s ninth-grade daughter.
Juvenile records are sealed, but Smith’s attorney Elizabeth Lancaster told The Daily Wire that a boy was charged with two counts of forcible sodomy, one count of anal sodomy, and one count of forcible fellatio, related to an incident that day at that school.
As Loudoun schools sought to pass a controversial transgender policy in June, it concealed that a 9th-grade girl was allegedly raped by a "gender fluid" student in a school bathroom just 3 weeks prior, The Daily Wire has learned.https://t.co/t5IEv1vZZF
Do you believe that incidents of rape are more common among:
1. Men who like to dress up as women; or,
2. Men who don't like to dress up as women.
Before I answer that, I'd like to know what those question have to do with this specific instance?
Allowing men in skirts to go into women's restrooms allows sexual predators in skirts to go into women's restrooms without suspicion. When you were a kid, a rape like this would be much less likely to happen because a man wearing a skirt going into a women's restroom could draw enough attention that people would investigate what he was doing there. The current situation made it easier for rapist to commit this specific crime. [Reply]
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan27:
Isn't that because Republicans could easily choose to allow exceptions to their barbaric abortion laws for rape without directly implicating anything else and they choose not to?
Speaking of, in places like Texas this girl would be forced to carry the rape baby of this monster to term if she was 18 and anybody who tried to help her get an abortion could be sued by anybody in this country. But I'm sure being pro-choice you have been vocally in opposition to this disgusting, backwards law, right?
I can tell you know you lost the argument because you are now trying to change the subject. [Reply]
It wasn't I took his bait but it did make me think of a convo I had with someone the other day about serial killers. Kind of ties into the Lebanon MO thing. [Reply]
Originally Posted by tooge:
Well duh. I mean, we are legislating to the majority here man. Sheesh. I'll let my daughter know that she needs to quit feeling unsafe about Tranny's in the girls bathroom and just shut up about it if she gets raped. We don't want to offend those poor trannys
Both parties are pro-tranny now. There is no “legislative fix” for this issue as it’s been settled. Even Hannity supports trannies
DT: You need to follow the thread of the conversation.
The post to which I responded claimed that the fiction in which the rapist was indulged contributed to the rape. I am simply challenging that claim. My guess would be that, statistically, normally dressing men are more likely to commit acts of rape than cross-dressers. Could be wrong. [Reply]
Originally Posted by El Lobo Gordo:
Before I answer that, I'd like to know what those question have to do with this specific instance?
Allowing men in skirts to go into women's restrooms allows sexual predators in skirts to go into women's restrooms without suspicion. When you were a kid, a rape like this would be much less likely to happen because a man wearing a skirt going into a women's restroom could draw enough attention that people would investigate what he was doing there. The current situation made it easier for rapist to commit this specific crime.
So it sounds like you believe the cross-dressing is part of the M.O., that this rapist actually committed a pre-meditated rape.
I thought your theory that it was a spur of the moment decision? [Reply]
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
DT: You need to follow the thread of the conversation.
The post to which I responded claimed that the fiction in which the rapist was indulged contributed to the rape. I am simply challenging that claim. My guess would be that, statistically, normally dressing men are more likely to commit acts of rape than cross-dressers. Could be wrong.
You need to misrepresenting what lobo gordo is saying. [Reply]
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
So it sounds like you believe the cross-dressing is part of the M.O., that this rapist actually committed a pre-meditated rape.
I thought your theory that it was a spur of the moment decision?
I said the fact that he was allowed to enter the women's restroom when other men can't made it easier for him to commit rape in the women's restroom.
I said it is wrong to force the rest of society to engage in his fiction.
I said that since the rest of society is being forced to participate in his fiction that can give him a sense of entitlement. A sense of entitlement that might go as far as him believing that society should be forced to participate in all his fictions....including ones in which he pretends his victim want it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by El Lobo Gordo:
I said the fact that he was allowed to enter the women's restroom when other men can't made it easier for him to commit rape in the women's restroom.
I said it is wrong to force the rest of society to engage in his fiction.
I said that since the rest of society is being forced to participate in his fiction that can give him a sense of entitlement. A sense of entitlement that might go as far as him believing that society should be forced to participate in all his fictions....including ones in which he pretends his victim want it.
mEn wHo wEaR skIrtS doNt rApE woMen mOrE thaN mEn wHO dOn'T [Reply]
Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower:
mEn wHo wEaR skIrtS doNt rApE woMen mOrE thaN mEn wHO dOn'T
That's a silly thing to say given that the vast majority of men don't wear skirts.
The reason we had segregated by sex bathrooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, etc was to give women a place to do certain things away from biological men. However you can't have those safe spaces for women when you mandate that all of society has to participate in the useful fictions of the tiny minority of biologically male transgendered.
Does mandating society participate in the useful fiction of the transgendered actually make the world a better place? Well for that girl that got rape is certainly didn't. [Reply]
