Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation.
“I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.
Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”
“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.
Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago.
“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.
Very convincing. A video of an idiot staring into a camera and stating the same bullshit claims over and over without even a scintilla of real evidence.
Originally Posted by patteeu:
Assuming the results hold, he’s batting .500 on campaigns for President. Sleepy Joe is only .333 after getting lucky with the perfect storm.
If you define perfect storm as being able to run against the most corrupt and incompetent President in history, then you would be correct. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Lex Luthor:
If you define perfect storm as being able to run against the most corrupt and incompetent President in history, then you would be correct.
I am correct, but that's not how I define it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58:
450,000+ ballots in battleground cities had a vote for only Biden. No down ballot votes cast, no independents, green party or write in candidates voted for on those ballots.
Have you got a source for this claim? I've been looking to see how many of those ballots were cast. Thanks. [Reply]
Originally Posted by oldandslow:
I know exactly how the law works. You, on the other hand, live in a fantasyland.
No, obviously you don't. If you did, you wouldn't be stupidly pointing to lost lower court cases, or even the Penn SC cases, as something proving your point in this matter.
If you knew what you were talking about Bush v. Gore would have made you more wise than to do so. [Reply]
Originally Posted by patteeu:
Assuming the results hold, he’s batting .500 on campaigns for President. Sleepy Joe is only .333 after getting lucky with the perfect storm.
Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58:
It only makes sense when you use common sense.
Republicans won all 27 “contested” House seats but somehow lost the presidency?
450,000+ ballots in battleground cities had a vote for only Biden. No down ballot votes cast, no independents, green party or write in candidates voted for on those ballots.
The winner has always carried 15 or more of the 17 Bellwether counties but Biden won just 1 of them. Trump won 16 of the 17 Bellwether counties.
I don't know where you're getting 27 contested races as your number, as Ballotpedia tracked a lot more than that, and there are several races still in progress/recount (And in those races, it is not a R shutout).
But I would ask: Of those 27 races, how many of them:
1) Featured a Republican incumbent
2) Were seats vacated by a sitting Republican and staying R
3) Were seats that were flipped in 2018?
It is more likely than not for an incumbent president to lose House seats in midterms and then for that effect to snap back in the next presidential election (and snap back in the seats that were lost in the midterms).
Can you provide evidence of the 450,000 votes beyond Sidney Powell claiming it? I have yet to see it. I suspect we'll never see it, because it - like a lot of the things she has said since the election - is not true or there is no actual real evidence of it.
It is clear the demographics of the country have changed slightly and that Trump effect changed them even more drastically.
Suburbs went more heavily to Biden than in previous years. States that used to be hard one way went differently as Demographics shifted. Urban areas that have long been D strongholds organized like crazy to register more voters and then drive voter turnout. Etc. [Reply]
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho:
I don't know where you're getting 27 contested races as your number, as Ballotpedia tracked a lot more than that, and there are several races still in progress/recount (And in those races, it is not a R shutout).
But I would ask: Of those 27 races, how many of them:
1) Featured a Republican incumbent
2) Were seats vacated by a sitting Republican and staying R
3) Were seats that were flipped in 2018?
It is more likely than not for an incumbent president to lose House seats in midterms and then for that effect to snap back in the next presidential election (and snap back in the seats that were lost in the midterms).
Can you provide evidence of the 450,000 votes beyond Sidney Powell claiming it? I have yet to see it. I suspect we'll never see it, because it - like a lot of the things she has said since the election - is not true or there is no actual real evidence of it.
It is clear the demographics of the country have changed slightly and that Trump effect changed them even more drastically.
Suburbs went more heavily to Biden than in previous years. States that used to be hard one way went differently as Demographics shifted. Urban areas that have long been D strongholds organized like crazy to register more voters and then drive voter turnout. Etc.
Originally Posted by HonestChieffan:
Maybe its just me, but wouldn't this have been done weeks ago?
I mean lets say they have some supersecret double 00 software machine language.....wouldn't dominion and the democrat scalawags have erased the stuff by now?
If it's erased, To me that would be proof of a cover up. [Reply]
Originally Posted by 65TPT:
If it's erased, To me that would be proof of a cover up.
Yes, if you had proof it ever existed.....
At the rate they are going they will haul in a machine as evidence, point out that this machine works perfect! Proof they erased the bad shit!!! [Reply]
