Have been banned from the other thread by an apparently sensitive snowflake (ironically after dozens of pages of political discussion from others) so I'll stick my thoughts on the NBA Playoffs here from now on. We needed a new thread anyway. [Reply]
People at home kept sending my son and me pics of us. They weren't allowing fans in the first three rows on the bench side so we became first row. I had to be careful not to be the guy getting caught picking his nose on national TV. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
I didnt used to believe in Devin Booker. Kind of how I dont believe in Donovan Mitchell. But Booker figured out how to be a more efficient scorer. Mitchell never will. Book > Mitchell. Booker has decreased his volume shooting whereas Mitchelll has increased it.
You don't believe in Donovan Mitchell?!? Dude is averaging 33, 3, 5 on just under 50% shooting and 42% from 3.
I love Booker, but I don't understand where you're viewing him as vastly superior. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
You don't believe in Donovan Mitchell?!? Dude is averaging 33, 3, 5 on just under 50% shooting and 42% from 3.
I love Booker, but I don't understand where you're viewing him as vastly superior.
Simple. Booker takes better shots and is more selective. I thought my opinion was evident by my post. You are citing stats from a small sample of games. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Simple. Booker takes better shots and is more selective. I thought my opinion was evident by my post. You are citing stats from a small sample of games.
Here are regular season stats, including PER. What am I missing?
Booker: 25, 4, 4 (48%, 34%) 19.33 PER
Mitchell: 26, 4, 5 (44%, 39%) 21.39 PER [Reply]
