Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
He's bigger, more athletic, is more accurate, makes better decisions, and to top it all off he's a year ahead in development.
Mahomes doesn't seem to have a lot of poise and plays too frenetic, and that will turn into a ton of INT's.
You may want to look at their completion percentages before saying more accurate
As far as athletic goes according to combine stats only thing Lynch did better was vert and broad jump while Mahomes ran faster so that seems to be a wash
Better decisions you will have to show proof of [Reply]
Originally Posted by mac459:
You may want to look at their completion percentages before saying more accurate
As far as athletic goes according to combine stats only thing Lynch did better was vert and broad jump while Mahomes ran faster so that seems to be a wash
Better decisions you will have to show proof of
Comparisons can only be answered by how they prove it on the field which neither have yet done. [Reply]
You can laugh at the Broncos for a lot of things but taking Chad Kelly with the last pick in the draft isn't one of them.
That's amazing value.
I personally wanted us to get him. Yeah, he's bat shit but if I gave you his game tape and you had no idea who he was you'd think he was a shoe in for day 2.
Regardless, we didn't pick him up so I hope he fails now. **** the Donks. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Iconic:
You can laugh at the Broncos for a lot of things but taking Chad Kelly with the last pick in the draft isn't one of them.
That's amazing value.
I personally wanted us to get him. Yeah, he's bat shit but if I gave you his game tape and you had no idea who he was you'd think he was a shoe in for day 2.
Regardless, we didn't pick him up so I hope he fails now. **** the Donks.
Agreed. He was selected in a throw away pick. The potential vs. cost ratio is about as good as it gets. If he never plays a down it won't matter. If he even contributes as a scout team qb it's a win. [Reply]
