Originally Posted by staylor26:
Oh shut the **** up. You would be one of the idiots defending this POS.
Actually I don't give a fuck what Keitzman has to say. He is a shock jock who says stupid shit to get people riled up, sports radio 101. Dumb blind homer fucks like you are the ones who take people like him serious. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry:
Actually I don't give a fuck what Keitzman has to say. He is a shock jock who says stupid shit to get people riled up, sports radio 101. Dumb blind homer fucks like you are the ones who take people like him serious.
Take him serious? I’ve lived in Florida my entire life so I don’t even listen to this clown.
Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry:
Actually I don't give a **** what Keitzman has to say. He is a shock jock who says stupid shit to get people riled up, sports radio 101. Dumb blind homer ****s like you are the ones who take people like him serious.
Except when that "shock" mentality filters over to places like KCTV5...and being unethical is deemed an acceptable practice.
People like him have influence whether you want to admit it or not...and it's all entertainment until it isn't...and star players start getting suspended due to "optics" based on rumor.
Most of the country still think Hill broke his kids arm and want him banned from the NFL...I wonder where they get this idea? [Reply]
Originally Posted by patteeu:
Oh. Another one of those. Thanks for watching out for everyone else's ears!
I really didn’t care whether the guy was fired or not, I just think it’s odd that so many are defending him or act like he was wrongfully fired when he’s clearly a moron and a POS that has attacked Mahomes, Reid, and Hill. He’s not even good at his job.
Why the fuck would any Chiefs fan care that this guy was fired? [Reply]
From a strictly business standpoint...why would CHunt and the Chiefs want to partner with an organization that is actively undermining them? Spreading lies and negative rumors about their product?
There is nothing wrong with objective criticism...but when it veers off into damaging people who work for them...and dragging their personal lives through the mud?
Kietzman was a parasite...he was making money off the success of the Chiefs and being allowed access. He just found out how unimportant he is... [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
I really didn’t care whether the guy was fired or not, I just think it’s odd that so many are defending him or act like he was wrongfully fired when he’s clearly a moron and a POS that has attacked Mahomes, Reid, and Hill. He’s not even good at his job.
Why the fuck would any Chiefs fan care that this guy was fired?
Ok. I don't really have any problem with the Chiefs or Andy Reid being upset and trying to get him fired. I don't have a problem with 810 deciding to fire him for business reasons. My problem is with the mob of people who have no stake other than as a listeners (and in many cases, don't even have that stake), trying to decide for everyone else what we should be able to hear on the radio instead of just managing their own listening choices. [Reply]
Originally Posted by patteeu:
If not the Gillette idea (which I like a lot), then fly one over Denver for the last game of the season. I think a fan movement like SOC following their team to the virgin territory of an opponents stadium would generate some media reaction. If SOC could afford to do both, that would be awesome.
Doesn't support mob justice
Originally Posted by patteeu:
I'm not forgetting that. I don't know what, if anything, the Chiefs have said to 810 behind the scenes, but I'm not criticizing them. I'm criticizing the social media lynch mob.
Originally Posted by patteeu:
Whitlock is right. This is a huge and disturbing over-reaction to what Keitzman said. I can’t help but think that most of this CP animus has more to do with cumulative petty grievances with Kk over the years and the thrill of a mob kill than it does with protecting Reid from the public expression of widely held but unpleasant thoughts about his son’s tragic death.
You're right. But Kietzman is the sacrificial lamb for the entire media. What they attempted was far more disturbing.
Originally Posted by Halfcan:
The balance of power in the NFL is about to change from the East Coast to the Mid West for the next decade. Many entitled D bags are not happy about that.
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
You're right. But Kietzman is the sacrificial lamb for the entire media. What they attempted was far more disturbing.
That's life. Don't fuck with the Chiefs.
^^^ this man is correct. The Chiefs have been SO ON soft on the media for decades. They are well within their rights to take this entire episode, wad it up in a big old piece of paper, and cram it right up their adversaries arseholes. [Reply]
Originally Posted by cooper barrett:
According to noted sources KK was ultimately released as a former female subordinate threatened to make public sexual harassment charges and settlement while under his employ.
I told you I knew a gal.....
I’m guessing she’d probably be breaking a NDA if there was a settlement. I’d be shocked if that wasn’t included. [Reply]
Originally Posted by patteeu:
How would you get that out of anything I've ever said?
Had anyone turned the dial anyway? Seriously? I bet their ratings bumped up a bit after the controversy. But that's irrelevant since my post was about you and the rest of us at CP and on social media, not about what business decisions 810 should make or how Andy Reid should respond to the disparagement of his parenting style. You're not going to tell me that your primary concern here is whether or not 810 makes a profit, are you?
Actually that was my first post in any of these threads and I don't do social media, so I'm not sure how your post could have been about me. You were protesting against "mob justice" for a person whose entire career seems to have been about inciting it. Just seemed such an odd dichotomy that I misunderstood your motivation. My primary concern is that I don't give a shit what either side does. More interested in the fluidity with which people seem to adjust their moral boundaries so as to judge the actions of others. [Reply]
Originally Posted by unlurking:
Actually that was my first post in any of these threads and I don't do social media, so I'm not sure how your post could have been about me. You were protesting against "mob justice" for a person whose entire career seems to have been about inciting it. Just seemed such an odd dichotomy that I misunderstood your motivation. My primary concern is that I don't give a shit what either side does. More interested in the fluidity with which people seem to adjust their moral boundaries so as to judge the actions of others.
I see. For the purpose of my posts in this thread, I consider CP social media. It's just a less efficient form (less reach) than the facebooks and twitters.
I hope you're just explaining your primary concern and not suggesting fluidity on my part. [Reply]
