This is a long ass article and definitely worth your time.
7.14.19 update:
Without further delay - we present some additional research. This article isn't about suspensions. This is now 100% about daylighting wrongs and helping someone caught in a tangled web of manipulation and pain. https://t.co/bQNC8Cyju4
— Chiefs Kingdom Editorial Board (@1_ChiefsKingdom) July 14, 2019
This morning at 6am PST, we received images labeled States Evidence & Court Transcripts from Tyreek's March 9, 2015 Probable Cause hearing. You can read about how Tyreek asked Crystal to leave his place on 12/11/14 before stuff went down & more .... https://t.co/jz0Hqj052i
— Chiefs Kingdom Editorial Board (@1_ChiefsKingdom) July 16, 2019
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say Tyreek has more trust in the Chiefs now than he ever has. They believed and trusted him enough to stand by him thru all this.
Granted that's because he's a fucking badass football player but they obviously like the person a lot too. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see fault in what Mellinger wrote. He clearly said “IF the allegation was true, then the Chiefs should release Hill.”
Come on. The tone of the articles coming out of the Star ominous. Additionally, the head of the Sports section, Rosen, strongly suggested in Tweets that they had all types of corroborating evidence against Hill. The Star buried Hill. And is it even appropriate for a newspaper to write articles...."If someone is guilty of unsubstantiated crime ABC, then XYZ must happen"? What's the purpose in that if not to prematurely bury a person? [Reply]
Originally Posted by FringeNC:
Come on. The tone of the articles coming out of the Star ominous. Additionally, the head of the Sports section, Rosen, strongly suggested in Tweets that they had all types of corroborating evidence against Hill. The Star buried Hill. And is it even appropriate for a newspaper to write articles...."If someone is guilty of unsubstantiated crime ABC, then XYZ must happen"? What's the purpose in that if not to prematurely bury a person?
Originally Posted by O.city:
I think that comes back to my theory that the star thought they had all this incriminating evidence that they got from the GF/Fiancé side.
I'm guessing Pryor got all this info and replayed it to everyone at the star and they thought Hill was donezo.
With a healthy Watkins, Kelce, JRob, Hardman, and some great pass catching RB's - teams will not be able to use Safety help on Reek like they did last year. He is bigger, quicker and more motivated than last year.
"They should be terrified!"
Go back and watch Mahomes 49th TD pass to Reek against the Faders- for a preview of what is coming! [Reply]
Originally Posted by FringeNC:
Come on. The tone of the articles coming out of the Star ominous. Additionally, the head of the Sports section, Rosen, strongly suggested in Tweets that they had all types of corroborating evidence against Hill. The Star buried Hill. And is it even appropriate for a newspaper to write articles...."If someone is guilty of unsubstantiated crime ABC, then XYZ must happen"? What's the purpose in that if not to prematurely bury a person?
So you would have them not report on news when it drops? That’s their job.
What Pryor and Rosen did was shitty and they deserve every piece of criticism thrown their way, but bitching at Mellinger for his piece doesn’t make sense.
He clearly said “If the allegations were true, Chiefs should release Tyreek.”
Sam was actually fair in his article as seen here:
Originally Posted by : We should pause here to recognize that the picture is still muddy. A police report and DCF investigation does not necessarily mean a crime was committed, and Hill has not been charged. You know how this works. But the parameters are heartbreaking. Life-altering. If true, the result is awful, most of all for the child and mother.
This is the story I’m referring to. The first one Sam wrote.
Wrote about Tyreek Hill. The first thing we all do is hope this isn't true. The second thing we'll have to do is deal with it if it is. https://t.co/jdRIAjwHUJ
Originally Posted by Redbled:
It’d be interesting to see a lawsuit develop from all of this for libel.
As I've said before a lawsuit is a win win for Reek. The Star and others would have to on record for their reasons of gotcha reporting. Hill might not win the case but he'd get his side of the story documented in court. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
So you would have them not report on news when it drops? That’s their job.
What Pryor and Rosen did was shitty and they deserve every piece of criticism thrown their way, but bitching at Mellinger for his piece doesn’t make sense.
He clearly said “If the allegations were true, Chiefs should release Tyreek.”
Sam was actually fair in his article as seen here:
This is the story I’m referring to. The first one Sam wrote.
Wrote about Tyreek Hill. The first thing we all do is hope this isn't true. The second thing we'll have to do is deal with it if it is. https://t.co/jdRIAjwHUJ
I’ll look at the following ones to see if he said something stupid, but I don’t see anything wrong with this first one.
The reason most are putting Sam up there with Brooke is that he was white knighting her story. He was also doing the same thing as she was, saying we have more info you have not heard yet. It wasn't a good look. [Reply]
If the NFL were smart, they would not want to set a precedent for scumbags blackmailing their players from this point forward. They would drop this sham of a case and put out a statement like this.
"After careful review, we have found that TR did not abuse his son and has not been charged with any crime. His custody situation is being handled and he is complying with everything that is asked of him. Although we are deeply disappointed in his language on a tape that was released, we feel that it was not intended as a threat of violence and taken out of context. Furthermore, new information has come forward, that the recording made without TR's knowledge, was also intended to shame him and cause him financial ruin. We are against any and all domestic violence and take abuse or even verbal abuse very seriously. TR has previously been suspended from the team while the case has been reviewed and we feel that no further punishment is warranted. We will continue to monitor this situation and TR's progress and if any further evidence comes out we will reopen our investigation. IF any abusive situation is found, TR realizes it will be dealt with the harshest penalty possible. Our main concern is the welfare of the child and we feel he is in a safe environment and hopefully will never have to go through this situation again." [Reply]