Originally Posted by ChiefsFan123456:
He said an hour or two within each other and it did not happen
You misread. Just take the L and move on, don't double down. You're going to make it go from a forgettable "who cares" post to making yourself look like an ass-clown. [Reply]
I mean Thornhill is entering his walk year. And Hill would be more of a swiss-army knife type safety similar to Mathieu than anyone we have, IMO.
So you could figure on him being the 'swing safety' with the Chiefs playing a TON of 4-2-5 looks w/ Reid playing something of a hybrid 'backer/safety and Thornhill as a single high.
Then if you can't get Thornhill extended or just don't want to, you could rotate Hill back into the single high role w/ Reid being more of an underneath sort long-term.
Finding snaps for him isn't my worry. It's just straight up positional value.
And man, have you EVER had a 1st round pick you actually wanted to make? Or do you just want to trade all of them for dudes that need contracts?
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Maybe O.City IS Veach.
Once I get past pick, 20 or so, no. I just don't see them work out enough to value them. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Veach just doesn’t seem to be the type to trade back, and it takes two to tango, so I don’t even consider that much.
You come out with Dax Hill and Sam Williams in the first 2 rounds and it’s already an A- draft at least.
Or Sam Williams or Devonte Wyatt or Cam Thomas and Jalen Pitre.
The idea of having 3 basic clones playing S and NB is kind of fun. You can do a lot of crazy stuff moving guys around and being truly unpredictable. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Detoxing:
You misread. Just take the L and move on, don't double down. You're going to make it go from a forgettable "who cares" post to making yourself look like an ass-clown.
I would not take the loss, If 3 players do not become Chiefs like BossChief said they would then that means BossChief took the loss [Reply]