Originally Posted by ThanksForTheLoan:
Umm, no he's not. One guy is going to the HOF and the other one who runs his mouth and whines a lot so badly wanting to be mentioned in the same breath as Gronk, is not.
Pretty simple here.
Did you see Gronk blocking last week vs a better Chargers D than KCs?
I did.
LOL... Kelce isn't better than Gronk, RIGHT NOW???
And you wander why nobody wants to engage you in serious debate. Cause you're dumb as shit... [Reply]
Originally Posted by ThanksForTheLoan:
Why wouldn't it matter? The offense sucked all year in the red zone, home and away and they finally found their identity in the last few games.
You are reading way too much into the home and away thing.
Advantage KC for being at home, or is it?
BB will be in their ear all week mocking them not being able to match what they did last week at home, on the road this week.
Good luck!
Only dopey fans would a ticked off Brady and the Pats.
See what living close to Duke does for you, folks? [Reply]
These frauds lost to Blaine Buttholes. That's all you need to know about them. But Bill's some sort of defensive genius. Just not smart enough to keep Gronk off the field in a hail mary situation or beat the trash Jags. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ThanksForTheLoan:
Dumbed down? Yes.
The Sox, Bruins, Celts and Pats fans are famous for having fans who don't do their homework and don't know their material stone cold.
lmao
Good one!
We're still waiting for you people to talk Xs and Os.
You’ve proven my point. This place would do circles around your entire fan base if you really want to get down to x’s and o’s but that would involve stats that you’re not willing to accept for arguments sake. [Reply]
Which offenses did you play late in the season to test yourself against? Andrew Luck, who had a 72 career playoff passer rating, who you held to a 78 passer rating? LAC who beat you?
We played PIT and LAC late in the season (one on the road, no less) and our defense limited both greatly. [Reply]
Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
The league has changed. What a tight end does as a receiver is far more valuable than what he does as a blocker in today’s game.
You’re really grabbing at straws here. Kelce is easily the best TE in the game. Kittle is second best.
Originally Posted by Frazod:
Oh we’re definitely not playing any of those teams. We’re playing a team that comes from the weakest division in sports, and right off the bat basically has six games against the Raiders. That’s six freebies, and other than that four division winners, one or two wildcard teams, and then more scrubs. Considering home field advantage and weather, you’re essentially gifted 10 wins a season. You pampered pricks wouldn’t be getting byes every year if you played in any other division.
How strange is it that year after year the Dolphins, Jets and Bills never improve?
How are we pampered? A commissioner was hired by the Jets owner to specifically use opportunities to frame the Pats to steal draft picks, with Goodell caught in court lying over and over to cover these secrets up. Everyone knows it. BB leaves the Jets, drafts Brady and that was it. If you can't beat em, cheat em with your handpicked slimy commissioner in tow. That's the Jets' slogan, in case ya didn't know. Those vile scum.
We lost SBs by not having 1st rd picks on the field, for chrissakes.
This is being pampered? What color is the sky in your world?
Next, this little myth of yours has been debunked 5 million times.
1. The Pats record outside the division is as good or better than IN the division, so you lose there.
2. The Bills, Jets and Dolphins play personal SBs vs NE, especially in their home games, where the games are actually close for that reason.
3. The Pats are simply that much better than the short term window teambuilding, moronic franchises known as the Jets, Bills and Dolphins.
Were you this angry when the 1980s 49ers beat up on the Saints, Rams and Falcons?
Hmm? Or, were you not born yet and don't know facts and NFL history?
And, there was no salary cap back then NOR a cheating commissioner (and owners). [Reply]