Such a Chiefs pick. Jalen Royals can be a 1,000 yard guy catching passes from Mahomes. Efficient route runner with reliable hands pic.twitter.com/JfxCgdmGDq
Out of 432 draft-eligible D1 prospects, Jalen Royals was: + 2nd in receiving yards per game + 5th in yards after contact per catch (minimum 600 yards) + Top 10 in yards per route run
Gat dam so much to love about this video, from Newports to Palmers framed pic of him interviewing Kelce/Mahomes post game in the background
Like how Smith calls out this dude from Georgia showing out, not some Utah HS brotha dominating a bunch of Mormon dudes
Also like how he normalizes his skillset by admitting he may have played against inferior competition which also comes with inferior coaching and QB play and now he's going to Reid/Mahomes
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
How? They have 3 good WRs already the chirfs rbs weren't good last year. I like this pick but this is a weird take
To make that statement you have to assume two things:
1) Rice and Hollywood will come back fully healthy and STAY fully healthy.
2) Pacheco and Mitchell won't.
Seems wholly inconsistent.
Rice is no more or less likely to come back at full speed from his knee than Pacheco is his leg. Hollywood is every bit the career brokedick that Mitchell is.
You're not applying the same standards here. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
To make that statement you have to assume two things:
1) Rice and Hollywood will come back fully healthy and STAY fully healthy.
2) Pacheco and Mitchell won't.
Seems wholly inconsistent.
Rice is no more or less likely to come back at full speed from his knee than Pacheco is his leg. Hollywood is every bit the career brokedick that Mitchell is.
You're not applying the same standards here.
Even if you assume everybody is healthy, Hollywood is on a 1-year deal, and next year is the last year of Rashee's rookie deal. And I hate to be saying this but I think Kelce is dropping off a cliff. We need to keep adding weapons and this guy seems like an insane bargain in Round 4. [Reply]