Yeah Baltimore would jump on that so fast
[Reply]

I wouldn’t trade a 4th round pick for Brown. But using their logic….the Ravens should give us their 1st for Hardman.
[Reply]

that's....turrible.
[Reply]

Barnwell is actually a pretty good follow and usually spot on.



Swing and a miss and a popped achilles on this one though. I thought the idea was to bring in more receivers who catch the ball
[Reply]

So I’m convinced we are going to package something to move up for Williamson
[Reply]

We may have to move up to 13. Maybe higher. At some point you have to think we'd lose our other first and I'm not sure that would go over well.

I hope teams get dumb about QBs and factor in the lost time due to his injury because I really want him. But Garrett Wilson and Williams are moving in the wrong direction
[Reply]

That Barnwell trade proposal is just, horrible. What has Marquise Brown accomplished in the NFL other than getting drafted high and getting hurt a lot?

Certainly not enough to be worth that package, and honestly I wouldn't trade Hardman for him straight up.

It's kind of like when people talk about how great the Broncos WR room is.

yeah, Jeudy was drafted high. And yeah, Sutton had 1000 yards that one time. It's just perceived upside.

I wouldn't take the Broncos receiver group over the Chiefs, and honestly, I am not sold that the WRs alone (excluding the massive Kelce vs. Okwuegbunaum advantage) are advantage ---> Broncos.
[Reply]

I'm not giving up what we gave for Mahomes for a WR. I'm pretty sure Veach feels the same way. Going from 29 or 30 to 13 is basically the same as going from 27 to 10. Way rather take what falls to us then that.
[Reply]

Shit proposals like this one has me getting REAL nervous about how much Veach MIGHT pony up to secure Jameson Williams.

Hope he doesn’t blow the draft capital he has today and end up making just 4-5 picks.
[Reply]

Barnwell's proposed trade for 30 makes some sense, though.

30 and 94 to Atlanta for 43 and 58.

Dropping down 13 to jump up 36 spots in the 2nd and 3rd ... wouldn't be mad about that.

having 29, 34, 50, 58, and 62 would be pretty slick. And gives you some flexibility if you do trade up in a few spots.
[Reply]

That I would be okay with. I'd be interested to see who we took at 29 in that scenario.
[Reply]

He's better than anyone we have. So if Hollywood is "no good" then none of our WRs are very good.

Explosive, gets college open.

The problem is having to pay him and give up draft capital.
[Reply]

That is exactly what I'd love to see happen.
[Reply]

Hollywood Brown isn't worth a 1st round pick and Mecole Hardman.
[Reply]

Already said I didn't like the value.
[Reply]