Originally Posted by jjchieffan:
The Chiefs would have liked to have kept Wiley as well. But he too priced himself out of the team. That doesn't mean that he was that great. If he wasn't replaceable, the Chiefs would have found a way to keep him despite paying Thuney and Taylor. Same with McGlitchy. If he was that great, the 49ers would have found a way to make it work. He was replaceable and walked
We LITERALLY lost Brown for the same exact reason.
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Yeah, that's one of a half dozen jabs at the former coach that I have enjoyed.
I do feel like Payton was a good hire, if not for his cap woes. At the very least, he should bring a winning attitude back to the culture there. I wouldn't expect it this season, but as time goes on and you know...quarterbacks get replaced. [Reply]
Originally Posted by InChiefsHeaven:
I do feel like Payton was a good hire, if not for his cap woes. At the very least, he should bring a winning attitude back to the culture there. I wouldn't expect it this season, but as time goes on and you know...quarterbacks get replaced.
Who knows, this is the time for optimism... it's a better path for sure. I'll wait until weeks 6-7 to determine if I need to postpone enthusiasm for another season. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Who knows, this is the time for optimism... it's a better path for sure. I'll wait until weeks 6-7 to determine if I need to postpone enthusiasm for another season.
Originally Posted by InChiefsHeaven:
I do feel like Payton was a good hire, if not for his cap woes. At the very least, he should bring a winning attitude back to the culture there. I wouldn't expect it this season, but as time goes on and you know...quarterbacks get replaced.
Payton is not a bad coach. He just won’t be the savior that many Broncos fans think he will be. They will be far better under him, I just don’t think they will be a legit SB threat. [Reply]
Originally Posted by tredadda:
Payton is not a bad coach. He just won’t be the savior that many Broncos fans think he will be. They will be far better under him, I just don’t think they will be a legit SB threat.
Speaking for myself and others that I know, few look at him as a savior... but he's the best they've had at the position in quite some time. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Speaking for myself and others that I know, few look at him as a savior... but he's the best they've had at the position in quite some time.
I agree. He’s the best you have had in decades. Probably since Shanahan. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Speaking for myself and others that I know, few look at him as a savior... but he's the best they've had at the position in quite some time.
Really? Because most Donk fans that I know are more like Knowshit. They think that Tater plus Paid a ton equals a Superbowl contender. A couple of Broncos fan pages have been showing up in my Facebook feed. 90% of them are delusional. [Reply]
Originally Posted by jjchieffan:
The Chiefs would have liked to have kept Wiley as well. But he too priced himself out of the team. That doesn't mean that he was that great. If he wasn't replaceable, the Chiefs would have found a way to keep him despite paying Thuney and Taylor. Same with McGlitchy. If he was that great, the 49ers would have found a way to make it work. He was replaceable and walked
The Chiefs got rid of Tyreek Hill for similar reasons. He was just too expensive to keep. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
The Chiefs got rid of Tyreek Hill for similar reasons. He was just too expensive to keep.
It is pretty obvious why they were willing to let him go. Reek is all about Reek. His actions and words have shown this from the day he was traded. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
And what happened next?
The Chiefs’ star players stayed healthy, the officials ensured they made it out of the AFCCG and they won Sodgate. Tyreek Hill had a great season in Miami too. [Reply]
