Originally Posted by petegz28:
Yeah, it's better to totally rip a guy who is in a completely new system because he hasn't done X in all of 3 games. And then to totally gloss over what he has done because it wasn't X.
That's logical....think hard and stuff
Makes a shitload more sense than saying that anyone who has pointed out that he's played poorly to this point is just a hater that expected 10 sacks from him by now.
You haven't engaged in shit for 'logic' in this thread other than the basic fallacies they teach you in 10th grade. Picking apart the arguments you want people to be making rather than the arguments they are making shows little but a fundamental failure to grasp any sort of nuance.
If you'd pay any attention at all to what 'the haters' are saying you'd realize just how stupid your 'rebuttals' are. You've truly offered nothing to this thread. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
Am I in your head already, bro? All I did was call him out for throwing out an arbitrary statement. No need to get your panties wadded.
To the standard of the resources we paid to acquire and retain him.
'Arbitrary' my ass - you're just illiterate. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
Makes a shitload more sense than saying that anyone who has pointed out that he's played poorly to this point is just a hater that expected 10 sacks from him by now.
You haven't engaged in shit for 'logic' in this thread other than the basic fallacies they teach you in 10th grade. Picking apart the arguments you want people to be making rather than the arguments they are making shows little but a fundamental failure to grasp any sort of nuance.
If you'd pay any attention at all to what 'the haters' are saying you'd realize just how stupid your 'rebuttals' are. You've truly offered nothing to this thread.
Apparently I've offered enough to warrant a reply from you multiple times. Meanwhile you and some others continue your complaining. You're crying over 3 games in a new system and you talk about someone else not grasping nuance?
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
To the standard of the resources we paid to acquire and retain him.
'Arbitrary' my ass - you're just illiterate.
Yeah, arbitrary. What level is the level? We spent X resources and he isn't playing to X level. What the **** does that even mean? You don't know. It's arbitrary bullshit. [Reply]
BAL actively tried to avoid Clark on 44% of his snaps, so Spagnuolo moved him around to try to nullify the gameplan. Even with that movement, Clark was still able to set up a rush plan.
Climbs the arc, gets OT to vertical set. Swats outside hand into counter spin for the sack. pic.twitter.com/soKf7PyMnd
A series of events in the fourth quarter made this game closer than it needed to be.
3rd and 5, KC up 17 points. Outside zone, and Clark sheds the TE to help Breeland get out in the flat. What should be a TFL results in bad tackling and a 6 yard gain to extend the drive. pic.twitter.com/oSDMKioL9Y
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
This is going to be an old school Chiefs beatdown on the NFC.
Nah. I'm pretty sure the Chiefs will feel out Patricia's D in the first quarter and then ICBM them to death in the second. Maybe put two scores on them in the third and then whittle them to death the rest of the way. [Reply]
People should read this. Baltimore was terrified of Clark. Designed their game plan around him. It seems other teams know more about Clark than we do. [Reply]