Chiefs and veteran free-agent defensive tackle Danny Shelton have agreed to terms on a one-year contract, per his agents @DrewJRosenhaus and @RyanMatha. Shelton was most recently with the Giants.
Originally Posted by ptlyon:
Somebody bookmark this plz
No one has the time to bookmark all the dumb shit that guy says. It's dumb shit overload. It's part of his strategy. Say so much dumb shit you can't keep track of it all. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
last year's chiefs team had a higher ceiling than their actual PPG, but not everything went right all the time
if this offense scores 24 in a given game you should be satisfied with that
24 ppg would have been good for 16th in the NFL. Because they lost 1 WR they’re going to become a middle of the pack offense? You’re a fucking idiot. [Reply]
Originally Posted by OKchiefs:
24 ppg would have been good for 16th in the NFL. Because they lost 1 WR they’re going to become a middle of the pack offense? You’re a fucking idiot.
you misinterpreted my post big time
if you put the chiefs points per game over the season on a bell curve, 24 PPG will be on there a lot with this group, and you should be satisfied with that
will they average more? probably
we're not dropping 50 in a game this year though, or winning a lot of games 38-34 [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
Danny Shelton sorta sucks, fellas.
And didn't we hire Daly in 2019? That's really the only truly good year he's ever had. I guess he had a pretty decent season with the Browns early on.
But he was pretty much ass with the Lions in '20 and '21.
I guess Rosenhaus was pretty happy with the deal we gave Dunlap? Or maybe Sheldon is looking for some real money? Because this just feels like a warm body.
He's terrible. The state of our dtackles OOOF [Reply]
Originally Posted by OKchiefs:
24 ppg would have been good for 16th in the NFL. Because they lost 1 WR they’re going to become a middle of the pack offense? You’re a ****ing idiot.
We were scoring more than that with Alex Smith an a bunch of fucking scrubs. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
you misinterpreted my post big time
if you put the chiefs points per game over the season on a bell curve, 24 PPG will be on there a lot with this group, and you should be satisfied with that
will they average more? probably
we're not dropping 50 in a game this year though, or winning a lot of games 38-34
A team with Patrick Mahomes at QB, a top 5 OL, better overall depth at WR, and Andy fucking Reid can’t drop 50 on a team? You’re an assclown. Go drink antifreeze. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
you misinterpreted my post big time
if you put the chiefs points per game over the season on a bell curve, 24 PPG will be on there a lot with this group, and you should be satisfied with that
will they average more? probably
we're not dropping 50 in a game this year though, or winning a lot of games 38-34
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
you misinterpreted my post big time
if you put the chiefs points per game over the season on a bell curve, 24 PPG will be on there a lot with this group, and you should be satisfied with that
will they average more? probably
we're not dropping 50 in a game this year though, or winning a lot of games 38-34
Middle of the pack offenses are run by QB's like Tannehill. You're smoking crack. [Reply]