Originally Posted by staylor26:
I’d be fine with either of those 2.
I had to kind of talk myself into them not being terrible in the 1st because it felt like the Chiefs might reach for a WR.
But in the 2nd? I’ll take it. I don’t have to talk myself into that. Not my preference, but it’s about where I have them.
What I noticed about this draft with it being fairly QB poor was that a lot of teams were surprisingly smart.
Not a lot of reaches and the picks that seemed odd on their face (apart from Cole and Green) were at least picks where a team was clearly targeting specific attributes and taking the guy that could provide them.
I think it was a surprisingly smart, level-headed draft. And in the end that means it will largely be blind dumb luck that determines who 'wins' it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
What I noticed about this draft with it being fairly QB poor was that a lot of teams were surprisingly smart.
Not a lot of reaches and the picks that seemed odd on their face (apart from Cole and Green) were at least picks where a team was clearly targeting specific attributes and taking the guy that could provide them.
I think it was a surprisingly smart, level-headed draft. And in the end that means it will largely be blind dumb luck that determines who 'wins' it.
Agreed.
Other than those 2 picks, I can’t really think of any bad ones.
Quay Walker ahead of Lloyd and Dean was meh, but at least he has a ton of upside.
The Cardinals trading away the 23rd pick for Brown might’ve been the worst move of the night outside of the Pats pick. [Reply]