So, the guy who wears the wolf suit and does the hype videos and goes to every game and makes funny memes disappears from Twitter over the weekend, with no posts from the Texans games.
Lots of people in “Chiefs Twitter” were worried about him since he normally tweets a ton.
Turns out the dude ****ing robbed a bank. Can’t make this shit up.
I was asked multiple times to be interviewed for this thing lmao. They’ve been working on it for over a year. Declined each time. I really just couldn’t care enough to want to talk to strangers about it. I will say I hope they go deep into the backstory of this ****er but otherwise it won’t be anything we didn’t already know. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KCrockaholic:
I was asked multiple times to be interviewed for this thing lmao. They’ve been working on it for over a year. Declined each time. I really just couldn’t care enough to want to talk to strangers about it. I will say I hope they go deep into the backstory of this ****er but otherwise it won’t be anything we didn’t already know.
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni:
How are you linked?
I was the original person who figured out where he was/who he was and what he did. Amazons research team eventually found out. I told them they can show my DMs on the screen for their show but that otherwise I didn’t want to be involved. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KCrockaholic:
I was the original person who figured out where he was/who he was and what he did. Amazons research team eventually found out. I told them they can show my DMs on the screen for their show but that otherwise I didn’t want to be involved.
Hold up. You learned his true identity, and that he robbed banks, and are the one who got him busted? How did you get involved at all in the first place? [Reply]
Originally Posted by wazu:
Hold up. You learned his true identity, and that he robbed banks, and are the one who got him busted? How did you get involved at all in the first place?
It was all going to come out quickly regardless of if it was me or somebody else. I don’t feel like I got him busted necessarily. I spent 35 minutes digging up shit to find out who he was and searched his name, police records etc and then matched the information I had of him being in the Tulsa county jail with the bank robbery. I then told a Twitter bro via DMs about what I found. At the time I told him I did not want my name attached to this information. But he spilled the beans anyways. He’s gonna be in the documentary now lmao.
So basically for the past year theyve been trying to get in contact with me to talk/interview. I told them I just don’t care enough to be a part of it but that they are allowed to show my DMs on the screen for the show. [Reply]
He stole $847,725 and got sentenced to 17.5 years. That's about $48,441 a year in earnings after taxes for maybe 20 hours of work casing the places. That's probably the equivalent of about $60,000 pre-tax. Now consider that he doesn't have any costs for food, housing, or clothing for 17 years, which is perhaps $25,000 per year post tax.
So that means that his net worth change for the 17.5 years is roughly $85,000 per year. That's a pretty decent living compared to the amount of work he put in.
Granted, he's being ordered to pay back $532,675. It's doubtful that he ever pays back a penny, but if he pays it all back that would lower his net by $30,438 per year. Add back in taxes and maybe his gross goes down by $40,000.
That puts him at about $45,000 gross for the 17.5 years, for almost no work. Why work a minimum wage job when you can do this instead?
And question here: why isn't he being ordered to pay back the full amount?
Originally Posted by Rain Man:
He stole $847,725 and got sentenced to 17.5 years. That's about $48,441 a year in earnings after taxes for maybe 20 hours of work casing the places. That's probably the equivalent of about $60,000 pre-tax. Now consider that he doesn't have any costs for food, housing, or clothing for 17 years, which is perhaps $25,000 per year post tax.
So that means that his net worth change for the 17.5 years is roughly $85,000 per year. That's a pretty decent living compared to the amount of work he put in.
Granted, he's being ordered to pay back $532,675. It's doubtful that he ever pays back a penny, but if he pays it all back that would lower his net by $30,438 per year. Add back in taxes and maybe his gross goes down by $40,000.
That puts him at about $45,000 gross for the 17.5 years, for almost no work. Why work a minimum wage job when you can do this instead?
And question here: why isn't he being ordered to pay back the full amount?
