Originally Posted by O.city:
6.5% of the cap this year is going to Frank Clark.
"YOu guys are bitching just to bitch".
When they can't afford to pay Creed or Trey Smith or Bolton in a year or two, maybe remember this money?
Originally Posted by O.city:
That money they're paying Clark this year and next or whatever, could have, you know, been rolled over and accounted for paying out the ass for one of those pass rushers you don't like.
They're paying out the ass for nothing with CLark. He literally brings nothing to the table you couldn't have paid JPP a couple million to do.
This contract was structured in 2019 and this year they brought his cap number down to what he was going to be paid regardless of staying or leaving.
This was a bad deal structure done by a young GM 3 years ago. Unfortunately it is what it is. You can’t just not pay a player his dead money.
Frank’s deal sucks but the good news is we’re getting good production from low cost players.
Karlaftis-11th in NFL pressures
Danna-16th in NFL in pressures
Dunlap-1 sack, 1 TFL
Originally Posted by O.city:
6.5% of the cap this year is going to Frank Clark.
"YOu guys are bitching just to bitch".
When they can't afford to pay Creed or Trey Smith or Bolton in a year or two, maybe remember this money?
Nah we’ll be fine with those guys. Frank is off the books completely after 2023.
You know how to keep us in this mess? By using the O.city gameplan of doing this shit again trading high draft picks and paying Brian Burns :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Nah we’ll be fine with those guys. Frank is off the books completely after 2023.
You know how to keep us in this mess? By using the O.city gameplan of doing this shit again trading high draft picks and paying Brian Burns :-)
They could have had him off the books now. Done. Gone.
But they didn't. Now here we are.
But don't worry about just burning that cash. No biggie. Don't bitch about Frank CLark. Go all Run and bitch about Chris Jones. Lets cut or trade him. Seems wise. [Reply]
Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn:
Did you seriously think edge set per capita was a real stat? :-)
I wasn't really paying attention to the post as much as I should have but honestly I just saw edge and thought maybe some weird pff stat someone found.
Regardless, to it mildly, Def dumb on my part! [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Yes he’s off the books after 2023. We get roughly $10.5 million from him after you deduct dead cap from the savings to release him
If we cut him this off season, there wouldn't be any money at all in 2023.
I feel like this has been said 100 times and some people just choose to flat out ignore it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
They could have had him off the books now. Done. Gone.
But they didn't. Now here we are.
But don't worry about just burning that cash. No biggie. Don't bitch about Frank CLark. Go all Run and bitch about Chris Jones. Lets cut or trade him. Seems wise.
Every team has a situation like this. It’s the NFL.
Go look at Kenny Galladay in NY. Hell Ravens fans want Marcus Peters gone yesterday bc he was lazy and is their 2nd highest cap hit this year, Browns are paying Baker over $10 million in dead money to not be on their team, Saints are paying Armstead $12 million to lot be on their team while their QB is getting killed, Rams are paying Robert Woods $12 million to not be on their team.
If’s and but’s are fine but damn you guys act like we are the only team with a problem player being paid too much to either be bad here or play somewhere else. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Every team has a situation like this. It’s the NFL.
Go look at Kenny Galladay in NY. Hell Ravens fans want Marcus Peters gone yesterday bc he was lazy and is their 2nd highest cap hit this year, Browns are paying Baker over $10 million in dead money to not be on their team, Saints are paying Armstead $12 million to lot be on their team while their QB is getting killed, Rams are paying Robert Woods $12 million to not be on their team.
If’s and but’s are fine but damn you guys act like we are the only team with a problem player being paid too much to either be bad here or play somewhere else.
We had an opportunity to cut him outright, have the exact same number on the cap this year and then had zero on the cap next season. Instead we elected to keep him and now we'll have $9 million in dead money on the cap next year.
This is AFTER it was clear he was shot.
WTF does anyone else's roster have to do with anything? They're two completely independent inquiries. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
This contract was structured in 2019 and this year they brought his cap number down to what he was going to be paid regardless of staying or leaving.
This was a bad deal structure done by a young GM 3 years ago. Unfortunately it is what it is. You can’t just not pay a player his dead money.
Frank’s deal sucks but the good news is we’re getting good production from low cost players.
Karlaftis-11th in NFL pressures
Danna-16th in NFL in pressures
Dunlap-1 sack, 1 TFL
^^^that’s how you balance it out
At the COST of adding $9 million in dead money to next year's cap.
Are you really not understanding this?
None of this is a result of the original contract. Take that out of the equation entirely because you had 2 options left even AFTER that fuckup.
A) Keep Clark on a $13 millionish cap hit this year and have $9 million in dead money on next years cap.
B) Cut Clark outright, absorb the same $13 millionish in dead money and have ZERO in dead money on next year's cap.
Throw the 'young GM' shit out because it doesn't mean anything. Brett Veach: Super Bowl Winning General Manager had options A and B above in front of him last March and he elected option A. That's friggen asinine. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
DJ, you wanna take this one?
Sorry I just got back - my god-awful heathen twins actually ganged up on their teacher, made her cry and then LAUGHED at her for it this morning.
This is a 7 year professional; the lead teacher at daycare. Someone that actually had my oldest at school and then has followed the twins from class to class for 3 years.
And they broke her. Then laughed at her for it. At 4 years old.
I'm impressed, furious and terrified all in one measure. [Reply]