Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
So far Clark looks like the worst player on that D Line. Okafor has even been pretty good besides getting juked by Lamar
Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball:
It's amazing that people that have watched the game for so many years and post about it everyday can be so ignorant at evaluating players
The absurd luck that the Ravens got yesterday usually results in a win.
Originally Posted by HemiEd:
Well? We are waiting.:-)
Should have said sometime tomorrow,got work to do. Also it doesn't matter what anyone says it's a god damn Frank Clark circle jerk in here right now. I'm going to go with Bill Maas' opinion over any of you guys. He says hes not getting it done and says that he's not getting doubled teamed. A "terror"? Lmao, show me one god damn clip of him being a terror. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
That's because he's doing his job.
So we gave up a 1st and a 2nd and 100 mil for someone to look like the worst player on the line? And that's his job?
That's a terrible waste of resources then. Clowney could have filled that role and been a lot cheaper. Or spread the money out and keep our draft picks and get multiple good players so they cant just run to the opposite side and get 7 yards a carry. [Reply]
Originally Posted by dlphg9:
Should have said sometime tomorrow,got work to do. Also it doesn't matter what anyone says it's a god damn Frank Clark circle jerk in here right now. I'm going to go with Bill Maas' opinion over any of you guys. He says hes not getting it done and says that he's not getting doubled teamed. A "terror"? Lmao, show me one god damn clip of him being a terror.
Originally Posted by -King-:
PFF grades him poorly for the season
"PFF IS JUST A BUNCH OF LOSERS WHO DONT KNOW FOOTBALL"
PFF says Clark had 4 pressures and may have played well yesterday
"SEE KING, TOLD YOU HE PLAYED GREAT!"
Shocking that they would do that considering that's basically all you do...play the contrarian to every point and use both sides of an issue to pretend you are right [Reply]
Seahawks got Clowney for a 3rd round pick next year and didn't have to give him a new deal. We should have done that and then used the saved picks to fix the left side of the defense where they're gashing us on the run. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
So we gave up a 1st and a 2nd and 100 mil for someone to look like the worst player on the line? And that's his job?
That's a terrible waste of resources then. Clowney could have filled that role and been a lot cheaper. Or spread the money out and keep our draft picks and get multiple good players so they cant just run to the opposite side and get 7 yards a carry.
He most certainly didn't look like the worst player on the line yesterday. I was sitting about 20 feet behind the Chiefs sideline. The Ravens gameplanned around Frank Clark. The Ravens obviously know who and what Frank Clark is. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
Seahawks got Clowney for a 3rd round pick next year and didn't have to give him a new deal. We should have done that and then used the saved picks to fix the left side of the defense where they're gashing us on the run.
We had two 2nd round picks and both of them are contributing as starters right now.
The 1st round pick they gave up for Clark wasn't going to "fix the defense" anymore than trading it might. [Reply]