I coach high school kids. "No cap" has entered my vocabulary with them. Also, I'd bet a quick search on urban dictionary would've further solved this before this thread opened back up. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
No to signing Mooney?
What exactly is the problem with that? Or do you just mean no if the choices are Hopkins or Mooney?
He specifically said,”would rather have Mooney,” Which is just hilariously ridiculous. Considering Mooney discretely, okay. As an either/or; just no. [Reply]
Nice. In before MahomesMagic bumps this thread in October to remind us that we could've gotten a "cheap vet" like Hopkins for peanuts if we had asked nicely! [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
He specifically said,”would rather have Mooney,” Which is just hilariously ridiculous. Considering Mooney discretely, okay. As an either/or; just no.
Megatard he's 26 Hopkins will be 32. Veach doesn't sign old guys for a reason [Reply]
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
Megatard he's 26 Hopkins will be 32. Veach doesn't sign old guys for a reason
Yay, Mooney is 26. And caught less than 500 yds and like 1’TD. Basically barely functional.
Hopkins, the old guy, went 1000+ yds and 8 TDs? If this were the choice only a Moron would take the young ineffective guy over the older top-tier player.
Not that it matters, because Hopkins isn’t going to be a Chief. [Reply]
are we actually going to be able to sign any of the decent/good free agent WRs? The priority has to be keeping Jones and Sneed and then how is the cap looking? [Reply]