My last hope for this pile of shit to demonstrate any worth is as someone who can absorb snaps and keep Danna fresh for pass rushing situations.
Danna is too small and not really all that polished so asking him to be a 3 down player is too much. If Clark can just fucking show up, take a few replacement levels snaps while Danna stays fresh and then Danna can try to muddle his way into a pass rush with fresh legs, we’ll at least get SOMETHING out of this bum. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
My last hope for this pile of shit to demonstrate any worth is as someone who can absorb snaps and keep Danna fresh for pass rushing situations.
Danna is too small and not really all that polished so asking him to be a 3 down player is too much. If Clark can just fucking show up, take a few replacement levels snaps while Danna stays fresh and then Danna can try to muddle his way into a pass rush with fresh legs, we’ll at least get SOMETHING out of this bum.
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
We got a big silver trophy from him.
Sure thing.
Guy was less important than Dan Sorensen in that run. Sure seems like it’s fair game to criticize the UDFA who’s making 10% of what Clark is and has made far greater contributions to the team than Clark the last 3 seasons.
It’s insane the rationalizations people continue to make for this trash. [Reply]
And again - if every post about Frank Clark requires some sort of qualifier about the Super Bowl, why don’t we extend Dan Sorensen the same courtesy? Or Austin Reiter? Or K-Pass? Where’s’ “sure Mecole screwed up again but man that kick return changed EVERYTHING!”
Why do people bend over backwards for this guy? Why do I have to put an asterisk by any criticism of him?
Why does Frank Clark get a pass for a championship that required incredible moments and performances from a couple dozen other guys who get nowhere near that kind of latitude?
Tell me more about how you don’t make excuses for him… [Reply]