I agree. I doubt we are getting a top WR in a trade.
[Reply]

Yep and why Cooks or Lockett makes the most sense.
[Reply]

I don’t think McLaurin would get $20 million a season on his next deal.

Not sure why Washington would trade him though. If you could get him for #50 though? Sure.
[Reply]

Brandon Aiyuk?
[Reply]

Doesnt Lockett get really expensive after this year?
[Reply]

If we give up picks and pay a WR 20 mil plus when we could
Ve kept Tyreek imma be pissed
[Reply]

That actually makes sense to me. He was known as a dog house guy in SF last year for not working hard enough in practice. I could see him or Shenault maybe a Mooney. They just had a turnover and Poles might want more picks to make a stamp on the roster.
[Reply]

I would take him if they were reasonable on the pick. He just been screwed by his QB. Hill will know that feeling soon.
[Reply]

I’d love that just so I can say “bitch” a whole bunch whenever we talk about him
[Reply]

Anyone they trade for is gonna need a new contract. Thats the way it goes. They aren't gonna trade for a guy without it being in place.
[Reply]

Maybe Kadarius Toney in a Bradberry combo trade?
[Reply]

You mean like they did with Orlando Brown?
[Reply]

Thats a pretty unique situation and not one I'd repeat. Wouldn't make sense.
[Reply]

And Frank Clark
[Reply]

See above post
[Reply]