Dane Brugler first mock - Page 3

Originally Posted by kccrow:
As an Ohio State fan, I might be a little harsh on Simmons ... but, even then, I like Conerly better as a pass blocker. I think Simmons is the more complete player though. Simmons is going to be a bit longer than Conerly I think. I'm gonna guess 34" arms versus 35.5" or so. That's just guessing. The fact Veach didn't go up for Troy Fautanu when he fell to 20 last year tells me he probably won't do it for Conerly either. They are very similar prospects. Although, maybe he did and couldn't because that was a pretty loaded gauntlet last year when it made sense to go get him. I do think he'll absolutely be interested in Simmons. Conerly does remind me a lot of Jason Peters... ugh

Thanks Crow, interesting
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
Where we pick, it's not even 50/50 at LT or DE. It's more like 20/80.

BPA. Just stack good football players and it will all work out.

Think you're right
[Reply]

I’m not a subscriber, maybe somebody else here is?

Top-100 Draft Board

(not enough spots to include all the DL)https://t.co/lWaFVak34z
— Dane Brugler (@dpbrugler) February 11, 2025

[Reply]

Possibly a draft to reload our DL. Kind of feels like its been a CJ95+ band aids spot for awhile.
[Reply]

I like Grant but his workout will lock him into the top-25.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Palangi:
Just say "NO” to RBs in the first round!!

unless you think it's the next hall of fame type of talent then it would 100% be worth it IMO

but if it's just an above average RB, you can find those later.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by In58men:
I’m not a subscriber, maybe somebody else here is?

Top-100 Draft Board

(not enough spots to include all the DL)https://t.co/lWaFVak34z
— Dane Brugler (@dpbrugler) February 11, 2025

I am but it's not in a very shareable format. If you want to know a rank on a guy or something let me know.
[Reply]

I'd rather re-sign Turk he's developed into a very nice player
[Reply]

Here ya go fellas

via Imgflip

[Reply]

Originally Posted by RunKC:
Here ya go fellas

via Imgflip

via Imgflip

I’m warming up to Donovan Jackson after reading about him. That would be ideal.
[Reply]

I guess its time to start the OL homework. I really didn't think it was that big of a need pre super bowl.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
I'm gonna be honest -- if that were the board (And it's not a bad board at all, just not a perfect one) I might....MIGHT....go Henderson with our 1st.

{ducks}

I just ****ing love what he could bring to this offense.

He could easily be Shady McCoy 2.0, IMO. Probably even a bit more explosive in a straight line. People see his speed and think he's undersized but he's really not. Henderson's a stout guy. Not a power back, but not a scat back either.

Someone like Sawyer is going to be a good player, but I don't know that I see him as a needle mover (or as the right complement to Karlaftis/Jones). And Fannin is a fascinating prospect but I just don't ride for the 'smaller' TEs that are really just bigger WRs.

I don't see an obvious OT pick and am not eager to look at IOL there. I don't see a WR left that's a ton better than who we'd be looking at at the back of the 2nd.

I'd be looking at Henderson and Landon Jackson there and I think I might just go with Henderson.

Afterall, if the 1st round of the draft is a 50/50 proposition, well we busted on our last 1st round RB so the math says this one hits...right?

I get it but, NO!

[Reply]

[Reply]

Conerly did not look good at the senior bowl workouts I saw. Small sample size but not impressive at all.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2:
Conerly did not look good at the senior bowl workouts I saw. Small sample size but not impressive at all.

Outside of the rep agaisnt Green when he got absolutely destroyed playing on the right side (not his normal side), he was fine.
[Reply]