Chiefs Let's talk about the Colts - Page 29

They just beat up on a dogshit Texans team despite only sacking Watson 3 times. Their defense couldn't get pressure against the worst OL in the NFL.

So, how many touchdowns will Mahomes throw??
[Reply]

so what have we learned? I'm confused

gonna be a blast... the week will fly by
[Reply]

I think Mahomes needs 45 to win
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Rivaldo:
so what have we learned? I'm confused

gonna be a blast... the week will fly by

We’ve learned the Colts defense is going to get shit pushed in.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Rivaldo:
Chiefs faced 4 top ten offenses... and gave up a shit-ton of points vrs them... prolly on par with the 38 the Colts yielded to NE

The point is the Colts supposedly impressive defense is a product of playing against weaker offenses.

The only top 10 offense they faced all season shredded them.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by BossChief:
I think Mahomes needs 45 to win

lead TD drives on 7 of ten theoretical possessions.

He can do it.
[Reply]

Here’s a few interesting stats.

Chiefs are allowing 5.3 yards per play at home. Colts are allowing 5.3 yards per play on the road.

Chiefs are gaining the most yards per play in the AFC at home. Colts are a tenth of a yard ahead of the Broncos in yards gained per play on the road (and rank right around the middle of the league).

Yards per play (IMO) is one of the more important stats to look at. It’s one of the harder stats to skew. Total yards is easily skewed by garbage time, pace of play, turnovers, etc. Total points allowed/scored can also be skewed by field position, turnovers, special teams scores, etc.
[Reply]

wat are the colts producing offensively per play on the road?

oh never mind lol

gettin late getting tired
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Rivaldo:
wat are the colts producing offensively per play on the road?

5.5 yards per play.

Not that it matters, but the Chiefs are gaining a ridiculous 7.4 yards per play on the road. That’s almost a full yard better than the second best team (LAC).
[Reply]

Red, you going around down-voting all my posts, you fuking gimp child?
[Reply]

How 'bout you enthusiastically suck my fat cock. Do something constructive.
[Reply]

I do know that Luck/Colts put up 0 points in the second half against Houston..which means Romeo made better adjustments.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by BleedingRed:
Huh?

You (Colts) lost 38-24 to a “top 10” offense.

PS patriots play in AFC East and are not a top 10 O unit even if stats say they are....

nice logic, Mongo.

Competing against weak divisional opposition has exposed the 5-time Super Bowl Champs as paper tigers come playoff time.
[Reply]

My biggest concern is whether we will be able to generate any pass rush against their o-line.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Eleazar:
My biggest concern is whether we will be able to generate any pass rush against their o-line.

Crowd noise will be a factor...

KC has gone toe-to toe with some top offenses on the road...40 at NE and 50 at the Rams.

Chiefs should win by 10+ points...do they have anyone that can handle Hill? They obviously dont have anyone to cover Kelce as they are 32nd against TEs. That's the beauty of finally getting Watkins back...it's pick your poison time again like at the beginning of the year. They were shredding people as they didn't have the defensive horses to cover everyone.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Crowd noise will be a factor...

KC has gone toe-to toe with some top offenses on the road...40 at NE and 50 at the Rams.

Chiefs should win by 10+ points...do they have anyone that can handle Hill? They obviously dont have anyone to cover Kelce as they are 32nd against TEs. That's the beauty of finally getting Watkins back...it's pick your poison time again like at the beginning of the year. They were shredding people as they didn't have the defensive horses to cover everyone.

We should know about Watkins Tues PM at the latest.
[Reply]