Originally Posted by penguinz:
And Rogers has half the INTs and 30 fewer sacks while playing in more games than Wilson.
Age will hit him in the face very soon. But yeah next year I'd pick Rodgers. If I was given Wilson for 2-3 years vs Rodgers for 2-3 years though, I'd pick Wilson.
Wilson had been banged up and trying to play through some stuff too. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Age will hit him in the face very soon. But yeah next year I'd pick Rodgers. If I was given Wilson for 2-3 years vs Rodgers for 2-3 years though, I'd pick Wilson.
Wilson had been banged up and trying to play through some stuff too.
Yea just ignore the 20 more TDs the last 2 years part he was responding to too because there’s no dancing around that…. [Reply]
If anything Rodgers has proven himself to be a drama queen. You can see my posts in this thread. And I am not all the excited about Wilson either. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Yea just ignore the 20 more TDs the last 2 years part he was responding to too because there’s no dancing around that….
Ok ok ok you win. Denver should have not traded for Russell Wilson and instead traded for Jimmy Garropolololol. That would have given them the best chance to beat the Kansas City Chiefs. [Reply]
Denver got a lot better today. The AFC west will be very tough next year. It’s very hard to be as consistently dominant in the division as the Chiefs have been. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Age will hit him in the face very soon. But yeah next year I'd pick Rodgers. If I was given Wilson for 2-3 years vs Rodgers for 2-3 years though, I'd pick Wilson.
Wilson had been banged up and trying to play through some stuff too.
You think you are helping your argument but you aren't. Only thing Wilson may be superior to Roger's is selfishness. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
It will be interesting to see what happens bc Wilson’s cap hit are $24 million this year and $27 million next year. So they will have quite a bit of money to spend being 11th in cap space post Russ trade per overthecap.
They’ll probably sign a few big players bc they have a 3 year window of cheap QB salary IMO
Originally Posted by louie aguiar:
Denver got a lot better today. The AFC west will be very tough next year. It’s very hard to be as consistently dominant in the division as the Chiefs have been.
Brady and Manning are frauds. Their divison were shit. Always shit and look what we deal with. Denver cant draft a QB for shit but get Manning and now Wilson. Fucking lucky fucks. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Ok ok ok you win. Denver should have not traded for Russell Wilson and instead traded for Jimmy Garropolololol. That would have given them the best chance to beat the Kansas City Chiefs.
That is not at all what this argument is you dumb fuck.
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco:
It's possible that he was or became that some time ago. I doubt this all happened today. This has been in the works for at least weeks.
They may have negotiated the framework of the Wilson deal a while back, but the fact it wasn’t executed until after Rodgers confirmed he was staying in Green Bay is telling. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88:
They may have negotiated the framework of the Wilson deal a while back, but the fact it wasn’t executed until after Rodgers confirmed he was staying in Green Bay is telling.
