Who came up with, and approved the Star’s punny headline “if Tyreek broke his son’s arm, the Chiefs must break with him”?
Did they consider it inappropriate? Or that it was malicious to perpetuate the idea that he might have before it was investigated (& proven incorrect)?
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy:
I would suggest being the bigger person but in this case that may not be possible
And pointless. We've learned that social media and shaming, even if not specific to the issue, is fair game in the world of suppressing people you don't agree with.
The let the fat fucking cunt-ass whore have it for both the content of her poor reporting, and because she fat in a world where women are supposed to at least be hot (because they can't play the sport). [Reply]
Originally Posted by GloryDayz:
And pointless. We've learned that social media and shaming, even if not specific to the issue, is fair game in the world of suppressing people you don't agree with.
The let the fat ****ing ****-ass whore have it for both the content of her poor reporting, and because she fat in a world where women are supposed to at least be hot (because they can't play the sport).
