I’ve always had a soft spot for RoJo but he had every opportunity in Tampa to seize that job and just couldn’t. Depends on the deal like always, fits the failed high draft MO though so I think Veach will do it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
If Twitter is correct than it’s either Bradbury or Gilmore.
Neither of which I want.
Gilmore had been injured. Not saying he's the same guy who won DPOTY still but if healthy, he's no bum. I wonder if he cab make a Charles/Rod Woodson-like move to safety in his later years.....
If nothing else he's a great add for the locker room to teach our DBs should Veach decide to draft a few this year-which he likely will.
I still think he can play though. His time with Carolina doesn't prove anything to me. They're trash. [Reply]
Originally Posted by mkp785:
Gilmore had been injured. Not saying he's the same guy who won DPOTY still but if healthy, he's no bum. I wonder if he cab make a Charles/Rod Woodson-like move to safety in his later years.....
If nothing else he's a great add for the locker room to teach our DBs should Veach decide to draft a few this year-which he likely will.
I still think he can play though. His time with Carolina doesn't prove anything to me. They're trash.
If the projections are correct he wants 12 millionish per year.
He still better be damn good if we bite on a contract like that [Reply]
Originally Posted by New World Order:
If the projections are correct he wants 12 millionish per year.
He still better be damn good if we bite on a contract like that
My issue generally with older players isn't the cost but the length of contract. If you can cram them under the cap for a year, great. Just don't want to be on the hook for longer [Reply]
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15:
I watched quite a few Packers games, and while I can't statistically prove it (someone else probably could if they cared) I feel like MVS's catch rate might be overblown.
They used him as a downfield threat A LOT, which is going to negatively affect that catch rate. And I like the idea of a 6-4 guy with wheels in this offense.
I don't get the Jones interest at all.
EDIT: Looked it up - MVS had 9 drops in 2020 and ZERO last season.
I’m actually fine with MVS now. We need someone who can take the top off the defense and he would bring that to this offense. Plus his speed can work on underneath routes.
Landry wouldn’t work here because you’d just be muddying up the middle of the field between Landry, JuJu and Kelce. They’ve found a role for Hardman and they need to keep him there.
Bring in MVS for the deep threat. Trade for Shenault and then draft a WR in the 2nd round. Get another in the 4th. [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
I’m actually fine with MVS now. We need someone who can take the top off the defense and he would bring that to this offense. Plus his speed can work on underneath routes.
Landry wouldn’t work here because you’d just be muddying up the middle of the field between Landry, JuJu and Kelce. They’ve found a role for Hardman and they need to keep him there.
Bring in MVS for the deep threat. Trade for Shenault and then draft a WR in the 2nd round. Get another in the 4th.
Hardman cant take the top off of a defense? [Reply]