Originally Posted by -King-:
Did you not see the post I was replying to? And I have already said Clark played great in the playoffs and we won with his help. Why do you skip over that when I say it? Do you just WANT to be mad? :-)
But we won because of Mahomes. If you have a problem with me saying "because", take it up with Dane.
I really don’t care what you said because you say one thing and then you’re talking out of your ass the next.
For instance, you pretend to give Clark credit, but then try to diminish what he did by talking about how many sacks the other teams had given up on the year and other stupid shit.
You don’t really have a solid stance either way, so you play this game of “LOL I already said that” like the little contrarian bundle of sticks that you are. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-: This is an overly convoluted way of saying Frank Clark was better in the playoffs than Dee Ford and didn't fuck over the chiefs like Ford did. Just say that lol. But the Chiefs won the Superbowl because of Mahomes.
Perfect example of what I’m talking about.
It’s so obvious that you are talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Nobody that reads this can’t see the shade you’re throwing at Clark, but somehow you can.
Originally Posted by staylor26:
I really don’t care what you said because you say one thing and then you’re talking out of your ass the next.
For instance, you pretend to give Clark credit, but then try to diminish what he did by talking about how many sacks the other team had given up on the year and other stupid shit.
You don’t really have a solid stance either way, so you play this game of “LOL I already said that” like the little contrarian faggot that you are.
He did play great. You can only play the teams you're given and he took advantage of the teams we played.
Why do you say faggot so much? Repressing something? [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
Dane
Asked
About
2018
Read the posts that I quote. It's not that hard Staystay. I swear.
Yea because he was making a point that you’re disingenuously pretending not to understand and turned into a way to diminish what Clark did. Dane is clearly pointing out that the Chiefs didn’t win in 2018 because of the defense, not just because of Ford (another oversimplification that doesn’t work in this context).
I follow everything, I just don’t fall for your little stupid fucking games that you play. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Yea because he was making a point that you’re disingenuously pretending not to understand and turned into a way to diminish what Clark did. Dane is clearly pointing out that the Chiefs didn’t win in 2018 because of the defense, not just because of Ford (another oversimplification that doesn’t work in this context).
I follow everything, I just don’t fall for your little stupid fucking games that you play.
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Still being a faggot instead of actually addressing my point.
No they didn't win because of Ford. That's not an oversimplification. If he doesn't step over the line, chiefs win 31-24 and end the game forcing Brady into 3 interceptions. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
No they didn't win because of Ford. That's not an oversimplification. If he doesn't step over the line, chiefs win 31-24 and end the game forcing Brady into 3 interceptions.
But we’re clearly talking about the difference in 2020 vs 2019, not just 2019.
Again, you’re being disingenuous by pretending that all we needed to do to win a SB in 2020 was replace Ford. It doesn’t fucking work like that and I know you know that.
This is exactly why you’re the worst. I swear you’re CP’s Toby. [Reply]