Could the Kansas City Chiefs go back to the trade market to find their left tackle of the future? One ESPN insider is watching a particular player closely if that’s the case.
ESPN’s Dan Graziano recently helped compile some last-minute free agency and trade buzz with the NFL’s legal tampering period kicking off at noon tomorrow. He mentioned that Houston Texans LT Laremy Tunsil could be a trade target for Kansas City if they’re unable to get a long-term deal done with Orlando Brown Jr. ahead of Monday.
Check it out:
Originally Posted by :
“One potential trade target I’m watching is Houston left tackle Laremy Tunsil. The Texans have resisted trading him in recent years, but he has just one year and a nonguaranteed $18.5 million left on his contract and could be a target of the Chiefs if they aren’t able to bring back Orlando Brown Jr.”
What would need to happen for a trade to materialize?
First, Houston would need to decide that they did not want to pay Tunsil a long-term contract extension. That would be a bold move considering they’re expected to draft a rookie quarterback and nothing is better for a rookie quarterback than an established left tackle.
Second, the two sides would have to agree on trade compensation. Would the Chiefs really be willing to potentially give up a first-round draft pick in 2023 (and potentially more) for Tunsil when they’re hosting the draft in Kansas City?
Next up, the Chiefs and Tunsil’s representation would need to first agree to a contract extension that would lower his 2023 salary cap hit. Right now, his cap hit would put the team over the cap.
Finally, Kansas City must view Tunsil as their “long-term solution” at left tackle. Will they envision him as such when he’ll be 29 years old in Week 1 of 2023? There is certainly nothing wrong with his ability — in three of the past four seasons, he’s been among PFF’s highest-graded pass-blocking offensive tackles. They should have no problem paying for that production, but would it be for more than one contract? It’s hard to say. When you draft a rookie in the first round, you get five years of control (fifth-year option), plus a likely sixth year of control through the franchise tag. Then you have the potential of re-signing that player to a long-term deal afterward.
There are certainly benefits to trading for Tunsil, but given what we’re hearing about what the Chiefs want out of the left tackle position this offseason, a trade might not be the route they take. [Reply]
Edit: Sorry for some reason I can't figure out how to post a tweet....Anyways it looks like this DJ person could just be responding to a tweet by Matt Verderame that the Chiefs plan to play Taylor at LT. SOOO could still be on the table for a Tunsil trade! [Reply]
We absolutely could still be in the market for Tunsil or any LT really because the Taylor contract is a Veach special. I fully expect him to restructure the agreement each year to bring the cap number down (it’s only $6mm this year and with future restructures would be $12mm in 2024 and $21mm in 2025 — essentially eating up the $40mm guarantee). You then face $21mm in dead money or extend him and do it all over again. Bottom line is there is plenty of potential cap space to bring on Tunsil and pay out a $20mm avg salary because the Taylor contract won’t be anywhere near a $20mm avg (more like $13mm/year). [Reply]
Edit: Sorry for some reason I can't figure out how to post a tweet....Anyways it looks like this DJ person could just be responding to a tweet by Matt Verderame that the Chiefs plan to play Taylor at LT. SOOO could still be on the table for a Tunsil trade!
